Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11), Herbert Spencer [historical books to read .txt] 📗
- Author: Herbert Spencer
Book online «Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11), Herbert Spencer [historical books to read .txt] 📗». Author Herbert Spencer
A Million Years Ago? The Truth Is, That Those Who Have Never Entered
Part 1 Chapter 1 (What Knowledge Is Of Most Worth?) Pg 19Upon Scientific Pursuits Are Blind To Most Of The Poetry By Which They
Are Surrounded. Whoever Has Not In Youth Collected Plants And Insects,
Knows Not Half The Halo Of Interest Which Lanes And Hedge-Rows Can
Assume. Whoever Has Not Sought For Fossils, Has Little Idea Of The
Poetical Associations That Surround The Places Where Imbedded Treasures
Were Found. Whoever At The Sea-Side Has Not Had A Microscope And
Aquarium, Has Yet To Learn What The Highest Pleasures Of The Sea-Side
Are. Sad, Indeed, Is It To See How Men Occupy Themselves With
Trivialities, And Are Indifferent To The Grandest Phenomena--Care Not To
Understand The Architecture Of The Heavens, But Are Deeply Interested In
Some Contemptible Controversy About The Intrigues Of Mary Queen Of
Scots!--Are Learnedly Critical Over A Greek Ode, And Pass By Without A
Glance That Grand Epic Written By The Finger Of God Upon The Strata Of
The Earth!
We Find, Then, That Even For This Remaining Division Of Human
Activities, Scientific Culture Is The Proper Preparation. We Find That
Aesthetics In General Are Necessarily Based Upon Scientific Principles;
And Can Be Pursued With Complete Success Only Through An Acquaintance
With These Principles. We Find That For The Criticism And Due
Appreciation Of Works Of Art, A Knowledge Of The Constitution Of Things,
Or In Other Words, A Knowledge Of Science, Is Requisite. And We Not Only
Find That Science Is The Handmaid To All Forms Of Art And Poetry, But
That, Rightly Regarded, Science Is Itself Poetic.
Thus Far Our Question Has Been, The Worth Of Knowledge Of This Or That
Kind For Purposes Of Guidance. We Have Now To Judge The Relative Value
Of Different Kinds Of Knowledge For Purposes Of Discipline. This
Division Of Our Subject We Are Obliged To Treat With Comparative
Brevity; And Happily, No Very Lengthened Treatment Of It Is Needed.
Having Found What Is Best For The One End, We Have By Implication Found
What Is Best For The Other. We May Be Quite Sure That The Acquirement Of
Those Classes Of Facts Which Are Most Useful For Regulating Conduct,
Involves A Mental Exercise Best Fitted For Strengthening The Faculties.
It Would Be Utterly Contrary To The Beautiful Economy Of Nature, If One
Kind Of Culture Were Needed For The Gaining Of Information And Another
Kind Were Needed As A Mental Gymnastic. Everywhere Throughout Creation
We Find Faculties Developed Through The Performance Of Those Functions
Which It Is Their Office To Perform; Not Through The Performance Of
Artificial Exercises Devised To Fit Them For Those Functions. The Red
Indian Acquires The Swiftness And Agility Which Make Him A Successful
Hunter, By The Actual Pursuit Of Animals; And Through The Miscellaneous
Activities Of His Life, He Gains A Better Balance Of Physical Powers
Than Gymnastics Ever Give. That Skill In Tracking Enemies And Prey Which
He Had Reached After Long Practice, Implies A Subtlety Of Perception Far
Exceeding Anything Produced By Artificial Training. And Similarly In All
Cases. From The Bushman Whose Eye, Habitually Employed In Identifying
Distant Objects That Are To Be Pursued Or Fled From, Has Acquired A
Telescopic Range, To The Accountant Whose Daily Practice Enables Him To
Add Up Several Columns Of Figures Simultaneously; We Find That The
Highest Power Of A Faculty Results From The Discharge Of Those Duties
Which The Conditions Of Life Require It To Discharge. And We May Be
Certain, _À Priori_, That The Same Law Holds Throughout Education. The
Education Of Most Value For Guidance, Must At The Same Time Be The
Education Of Most Value For Discipline. Let Us Consider The Evidence.
One Advantage Claimed For That Devotion To Language-Learning Which Forms
So Prominent A Feature In The Ordinary _Curriculum_, Is, That The Memory
Is Thereby Strengthened. This Is Assumed To Be An Advantage Peculiar To
The Study Of Words. But The Truth Is, That The Sciences Afford Far Wider
Fields For The Exercise Of Memory. It Is No Slight Task To Remember
Everything About Our Solar System; Much More To Remember All That Is
Known Concerning The Structure Of Our Galaxy. The Number Of Compound
Substances, To Which Chemistry Daily Adds, Is So Great That Few, Save
Professors, Can Enumerate Them; And To Recollect The Atomic
Constitutions And Affinities Of All These Compounds, Is Scarcely
Possible Without Making Chemistry The Occupation Of Life. In The
Enormous Mass Of Phenomena Presented By The Earth's Crust, And In The
Still More Enormous Mass Of Phenomena Presented By The Fossils It
Contains, There Is Matter Which It Takes The Geological Student Years Of
Application To Master. Each Leading Division Of Physics--Sound, Heat,
Light, Electricity--Includes Facts Numerous Enough To Alarm Any One
Proposing To Learn Them All. And When We Pass To The Organic Sciences,
The Effort Of Memory Required Becomes Still Greater. In Human Anatomy
Alone, The Quantity Of Detail Is So Great, That The Young Surgeon Has
Commonly To Get It Up Half-A-Dozen Times Before He Can Permanently
Retain It. The Number Of Species Of Plants Which Botanists Distinguish,
Amounts To Some 320,000; While The Varied Forms Of Animal Life With
Which The Zoologist Deals, Are Estimated At Some 2,000,000. So Vast Is
The Accumulation Of Facts Which Men Of Science Have Before Them, That
Only By Dividing And Subdividing Their Labours Can They Deal With It. To
A Detailed Knowledge Of His Own Division, Each Adds But A General
Knowledge Of The Allied Ones; Joined Perhaps To A Rudimentary
Acquaintance With Some Others. Surely, Then, Science, Cultivated Even To
A Very Moderate Extent, Affords Adequate Exercise For Memory. To Say The
Very Least, It Involves Quite As Good A Discipline For This Faculty As
Language Does.
But Now Mark That While, For The Training Of Mere Memory, Science Is As
Good As, If Not Better Than, Language; It Has An Immense Superiority In
The Kind Of Memory It Trains. In The Acquirement Of A Language, The
Connections Of Ideas To Be Established In The Mind Correspond To Facts
That Are In Great Measure Accidental; Whereas, In The Acquirement Of
Science, The Connections Of Ideas To Be Established In The Mind
Correspond To Facts That Are Mostly Necessary. It Is True That The
Relations Of Words To Their Meanings Are In One Sense Natural; That The
Genesis Of These Relations May Be Traced Back A Certain Distance, Though
Rarely To The Beginning; And That The Laws Of This Genesis Form A Branch
Of Mental Science--The Science Of Philology. But Since It Will Not Be
Contended That In The Acquisition Of Languages, As Ordinarily Carried
On, These Natural Relations Between Words And Their Meanings Are
Habitually Traced, And Their Laws Explained; It Must Be Admitted That
They Are Commonly Learned As Fortuitous Relations. On The Other Hand,
The Relations Which Science Presents Are Causal Relations; And, When
Properly Taught, Are Understood As Such. While Language Familiarises
With Non-Rational Relations, Science Familiarises With Rational
Relations. While The One Exercises Memory Only, The Other Exercises Both
Memory And Understanding.
Part 1 Chapter 1 (What Knowledge Is Of Most Worth?) Pg 20Observe Next, That A Great Superiority Of Science Over Language As A
Means Of Discipline, Is, That It Cultivates The Judgment. As, In A
Lecture On Mental Education Delivered At The Royal Institution,
Professor Faraday Well Remarks, The Most Common Intellectual Fault Is
Deficiency Of Judgment. "Society, Speaking Generally," He Says, "Is Not
Only Ignorant As Respects Education Of The Judgment, But It Is Also
Ignorant Of Its Ignorance." And The Cause To Which He Ascribes This
State, Is Want Of Scientific Culture. The Truth Of His Conclusion Is
Obvious. Correct Judgment With Regard To Surrounding Objects, Events,
And Consequences, Becomes Possible Only Through Knowledge Of The Way In
Which Surrounding Phenomena Depend On Each Other. No Extent Of
Acquaintance With The Meanings Of Words, Will Guarantee Correct
Inferences Respecting Causes And Effects. The Habit Of Drawing
Conclusions From Data, And Then Of Verifying Those Conclusions By
Observation And Experiment, Can Alone Give The Power Of Judging
Correctly. And That It Necessitates This Habit Is One Of The Immense
Advantages Of Science.
Not Only, However, For Intellectual Discipline Is Science The Best; But
Also For _Moral_ Discipline. The Learning Of Languages Tends, If
Anything, Further To Increase The Already Undue Respect For Authority.
Such And Such Are The Meanings Of These Words, Says The Teacher Of The
Dictionary. So And So Is The Rule In This Case, Says The Grammar. By The
Pupil These Dicta Are Received As Unquestionable. His Constant Attitude
Of Mind Is That Of Submission To Dogmatic Teaching. And A Necessary
Result Is A Tendency To Accept Without Inquiry Whatever Is Established.
Quite Opposite Is The Mental Tone Generated By The Cultivation Of
Science. Science Makes Constant Appeal To Individual Reason. Its Truths
Are Not Accepted On Authority Alone; But All Are At Liberty To Test
Them--Nay, In Many Cases, The Pupil Is Required To Think Out His Own
Conclusions. Every Step In A Scientific Investigation Is Submitted To
His Judgment. He Is Not Asked To Admit It Without Seeing It To Be True.
And The Trust In His Own Powers Thus Produced Is Further Increased By
The Uniformity With Which Nature Justifies His Inferences When They Are
Correctly Drawn. From All Which There Flows That Independence Which Is A
Most Valuable Element In Character. Nor Is This The Only Moral Benefit
Bequeathed By Scientific Culture. When Carried On, As It Should Always
Be, As Much As Possible Under The Form Of Original Research, It
Exercises Perseverance And Sincerity. As Says Professor Tyndall Of
Inductive Inquiry, "It Requires Patient Industry, And An Humble And
Conscientious Acceptance Of What Nature Reveals. The First Condition Of
Success Is An Honest Receptivity And A Willingness To Abandon All
Preconceived Notions, However Cherished, If They Be Found To Contradict
The Truth. Believe Me, A Self-Renunciation Which Has Something Noble In
It, And Of Which The World Never Hears, Is Often Enacted In The Private
Experience Of The True Votary Of Science."
Lastly We Have To Assert--And The Assertion Will, We Doubt Not, Cause
Extreme Surprise--That The Discipline Of Science Is Superior To That Of
Our Ordinary Education, Because Of The _Religious_ Culture That It
Gives. Of Course We Do Not Here Use The Words Scientific And Religious
In Their Ordinary Limited Acceptations; But In Their Widest And Highest
Acceptations. Doubtless, To The Superstitions That Pass Under The Name
Of Religion, Science Is Antagonistic; But Not To The Essential Religion
Which These Superstitions Merely Hide. Doubtless, Too, In Much Of The
Science That Is Current, There Is A Pervading Spirit Of Irreligion; But
Not In That True Science Which Had Passed Beyond The Superficial Into
The Profound.
"True Science And True Religion," Says Professor Huxley At The
Close Of A Recent Course Of Lectures, "Are Twin-Sisters, And The
Separation Of Either From The Other Is Sure To Prove The Death Of
Both. Science Prospers Exactly In Proportion As It Is Religious;
And Religion Flourishes In Exact Proportion To The Scientific Depth
And Firmness Of Its Basis. The Great Deeds Of Philosophers Have
Been Less The Fruit Of Their Intellect Than Of The Direction Of
That Intellect By An Eminently Religious Tone Of Mind. Truth Has
Yielded Herself Rather To Their Patience, Their Love, Their
Single-Heartedness, And Their Self-Denial,
Comments (0)