Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11), Herbert Spencer [historical books to read .txt] 📗
- Author: Herbert Spencer
Book online «Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11), Herbert Spencer [historical books to read .txt] 📗». Author Herbert Spencer
Clause "In So Far As Boys Are Concerned." Unfortunately The Fact Is
Quite Otherwise With Girls. It Chances, Somewhat Strangely, That We Have
Daily Opportunity Of Drawing A Comparison. We Have Both A Boys' School
And A Girls' School Within View; And The Contrast Between Them Is
Remarkable. In The One Case, Nearly The Whole Of A Large Garden Is
Turned Into An Open, Gravelled Space, Affording Ample Scope For Games,
And Supplied With Poles And Horizontal Bars For Gymnastic Exercises.
Every Day Before Breakfast, Again Towards Eleven O'clock, Again At
Mid-Day, Again In The Afternoon, And Once More After School Is Over, The
Neighbourhood Is Awakened By A Chorus Of Shouts And Laughter As The Boys
Rush Out To Play; And For As Long As They Remain, Both Eyes And Ears
Give Proof That They Are Absorbed In That Enjoyable Activity Which Makes
The Pulse Bound And Ensures The Healthful Activity Of Every Organ. How
Unlike Is The Picture Offered By The "Establishment For Young Ladies!"
Until The Fact Was Pointed Out, We Actually Did Not Know That We Had A
Girl's School As Close To Us As The School For Boys. The Garden, Equally
Large With The Other, Affords No Sign Whatever Of Any Provision For
Juvenile Recreation; But Is Entirely Laid Out With Prim Grass-Plots,
Gravel-Walks, Shrubs, And Flowers, After The Usual Suburban Style.
During Five Months We Have Not Once Had Our Attention Drawn To The
Premises By A Shout Or A Laugh. Occasionally Girls May Be Observed
Sauntering Along The Paths With Lesson-Books In Their Hands, Or Else
Walking Arm-In-Arm. Once Indeed, We Saw One Chase Another Round The
Garden; But, With This Exception, Nothing Like Vigorous Exertion Has
Been Visible.
Why This Astounding Difference? Is It That The Constitution Of A Girl
Differs So Entirely From That Of A Boy As Not To Need These Active
Exercises? Is It That A Girl Has None Of The Promptings To Vociferous
Play By Which Boys Are Impelled? Or Is It That, While In Boys These
Promptings Are To Be Regarded As Stimuli To A Bodily Activity Without
Which There Cannot Be Adequate Development, To Their Sisters, Nature Has
Given Them For No Purpose Whatever--Unless It Be For The Vexation Of
School-Mistresses? Perhaps, However, We Mistake The Aim Of Those Who
Train The Gentler Sex. We Have A Vague Suspicion That To Produce A
Robust _Physique_ Is Thought Undesirable; That Rude Health And Abundant
Vigour Are Considered Somewhat Plebeian; That A Certain Delicacy, A
Strength Not Competent To More Than A Mile Or Two's Walk, An Appetite
Fastidious And Easily Satisfied, Joined With That Timidity Which
Commonly Accompanies Feebleness, Are Held More Lady-Like. We Do Not
Expect That Any Would Distinctly Avow This; But We Fancy The
Governess-Mind Is Haunted By An Ideal Young Lady Bearing Not A Little
Resemblance To This Type. If So, It Must Be Admitted That The
Established System Is Admirably Calculated To Realise This Ideal. But To
Suppose That Such Is The Ideal Of The Opposite Sex Is A Profound
Mistake. That Men Are Not Commonly Drawn Towards Masculine Women, Is
Doubtless True. That Such Relative Weakness As Asks The Protection Of
Superior Strength, Is An Element Of Attraction, We Quite Admit. But The
Difference Thus Responded To By The Feelings Of Men, Is The Natural,
Pre-Established Difference, Which Will Assert Itself Without Artificial
Appliances. And When, By Artificial Appliances, The Degree Of This
Difference Is Increased, It Becomes An Element Of Repulsion Rather Than
Of Attraction.
"Then Girls Should Be Allowed To Run Wild--To Become As Rude As Boys,
And Grow Up Into Romps And Hoydens!" Exclaims Some Defender Of The
Proprieties. This, We Presume, Is The Ever-Present Dread Of
School-Mistresses. It Appears, On Inquiry, That At "Establishments For
Young Ladies" Noisy Play Like That Daily Indulged In By Boys, Is A
Punishable Offence; And We Infer That It Is Forbidden, Lest Unlady-Like
Habits Should Be Formed. The Fear Is Quite Groundless, However. For If
The Sportive Activity Allowed To Boys Does Not Prevent Them From Growing
Up Into Gentlemen; Why Should A Like Sportive Activity Prevent Girls
From Growing Up Into Ladies? Rough As May Have Been Their Play-Ground
Frolics, Youths Who Have Left School Do Not Indulge In Leap-Frog In The
Street, Or Marbles In The Drawing-Room. Abandoning Their Jackets, They
Abandon At The Same Time Boyish Games; And Display An Anxiety--Often A
Ludicrous Anxiety--To Avoid Whatever Is Not Manly. If Now, On Arriving
At The Due Age, This Feeling Of Masculine Dignity Puts So Efficient A
Restraint On The Sports Of Boyhood, Will Not The Feeling Of Feminine
Modesty, Gradually Strengthening As Maturity Is Approached, Put An
Efficient Restraint On The Like Sports Of Girlhood? Have Not Women Even
A Greater Regard For Appearances Than Men? And Will There Not
Consequently Arise In Them Even A Stronger Check To Whatever Is Rough Or
Part 1 Chapter 4 (Physical Education) Pg 58Boisterous? How Absurd Is The Supposition That The Womanly Instincts
Would Not Assert Themselves But For The Rigorous Discipline Of
School-Mistresses!
In This, As In Other Cases, To Remedy The Evils Of One Artificiality,
Another Artificiality Has Been Introduced. The Natural, Spontaneous
Exercise Having Been Forbidden, And The Bad Consequences Of No Exercise
Having Become Conspicuous, There Has Been Adopted A System Of Factitious
Exercise--Gymnastics. That This Is Better Than Nothing We Admit; But
That It Is An Adequate Substitute For Play We Deny. The Defects Are Both
Positive And Negative. In The First Place, These Formal, Muscular
Motions, Necessarily Less Varied Than Those Accompanying Juvenile
Sports, Do Not Secure So Equable A Distribution Of Action To All Parts
Of The Body; Whence It Results That The Exertion, Falling On Special
Parts, Produces Fatigue Sooner Than It Would Else Have Done: To Which,
In Passing, Let Us Add, That, If Constantly Repeated, This Exertion Of
Special Parts Leads To A Disproportionate Development. Again, The
Quantity Of Exercise Thus Taken Will Be Deficient, Not Only In
Consequence Of Uneven Distribution; But There Will Be A Further
Deficiency In Consequence Of Lack Of Interest. Even When Not Made
Repulsive, As They Sometimes Are By Assuming The Shape Of Appointed
Lessons, These Monotonous Movements Are Sure To Become Wearisome From
The Absence Of Amusement. Competition, It Is True, Serves As A Stimulus;
But It Is Not A Lasting Stimulus, Like That Enjoyment Which Accompanies
Varied Play. The Weightiest Objection, However, Still Remains. Besides
Being Inferior In Respect Of The _Quantity_ Of Muscular Exertion Which
They Secure, Gymnastics Are Still More Inferior In Respect Of The
_Quality_. This Comparative Want Of Enjoyment Which We Have Named As A
Cause Of Early Desistance From Artificial Exercises, Is Also A Cause Of
Inferiority In The Effects They Produce On The System. The Common
Assumption That, So Long As The Amount Of Bodily Action Is The Same, It
Matters Not Whether It Be Pleasurable Or Otherwise, Is A Grave Mistake.
An Agreeable Mental Excitement Has A Highly Invigorating Influence. See
The Effect Produced Upon An Invalid By Good News, Or By The Visit Of An
Old Friend. Mark How Careful Medical Men Are To Recommend Lively Society
To Debilitated Patients. Remember How Beneficial To Health Is The
Gratification Produced By Change Of Scene. The Truth Is That Happiness
Is The Most Powerful Of Tonics. By Accelerating The Circulation Of The
Blood, It Facilitates The Performance Of Every Function; And So Tends
Alike To Increase Health When It Exists, And To Restore It When It Has
Been Lost. Hence The Intrinsic Superiority Of Play To Gymnastics. The
Extreme Interest Felt By Children In Their Games, And The Riotous Glee
With Which They Carry On Their Rougher Frolics, Are Of As Much
Importance As The Accompanying Exertion. And As Not Supplying These
Mental Stimuli, Gymnastics Must Be Radically Defective.
Granting Then, As We Do, That Formal Exercises Of The Limbs Are Better
Than Nothing--Granting, Further, That They May Be Used With Advantage As
Supplementary Aids; We Yet Contend That They Can Never Serve In Place Of
The Exercises Prompted By Nature. For Girls, As Well As Boys, The
Sportive Activities To Which The Instincts Impel, Are Essential To
Bodily Welfare. Whoever Forbids Them, Forbids The Divinely-Appointed
Means To Physical Development.
A Topic Still Remains--One Perhaps More Urgently Demanding Consideration
Than Any Of The Foregoing. It Is Asserted By Not A Few, That Among The
Educated Classes The Younger Adults And Those Who Are Verging On
Maturity, Are Neither So Well Grown Nor So Strong As Their Seniors. On
First Hearing This Assertion, We Were Inclined To Class It As One Of
The Many Manifestations Of The Old Tendency To Exalt The Past At The
Expense Of The Present. Calling To Mind The Facts That, As Measured By
Ancient Armour, Modern Men Are Proved To Be Larger Than Ancient Men; And
That The Tables Of Mortality Show No Diminution, But Rather An Increase,
In The Duration Of Life, We Paid Little Attention To What Seemed A
Groundless Belief. Detailed Observation, However, Has Shaken Our
Opinion. Omitting From The Comparison The Labouring Classes, We Have
Noticed A Majority Of Cases In Which The Children Do Not Reach The
Stature Of Their Parents; And, In Massiveness, Making Due Allowance For
Difference Of Age, There Seems A Like Inferiority. Medical Men Say That
Now-A-Days People Cannot Bear Nearly So Much Depletion As In Times Gone
By. Premature Baldness Is Far More Common Than It Used To Be. And An
Early Decay Of Teeth Occurs In The Rising Generation With Startling
Frequency. In General Vigour The Contrast Appears Equally Striking. Men
Of Past Generations, Living Riotously As They Did, Could Bear More Than
Men Of The Present Generation, Who Live Soberly, Can Bear. Though They
Drank Hard, Kept Irregular Hours, Were Regardless Of Fresh Air, And
Thought Little Of Cleanliness, Our Recent Ancestors Were Capable Of
Prolonged Application Without Injury, Even To A Ripe Old Age: Witness
The Annals Of The Bench And The Bar. Yet We Who Think Much About Our
Bodily Welfare; Who Eat With Moderation, And Do Not Drink To Excess; Who
Attend To Ventilation, And Use Frequent Ablutions; Who Make Annual
Excursions, And Have The Benefit Of Greater Medical Knowledge;--We Are
Continually Breaking Down Under Our Work. Paying Considerable Attention
To The Laws Of Health, We Seem To Be Weaker Than Our Grandfathers Who,
In Many Respects, Defied The Laws Of Health. And, Judging From The
Appearance And Frequent Ailments Of The Rising Generation, They Are
Likely To Be Even Less Robust Than Ourselves.
What Is The Meaning Of This? Is It That Past Over-Feeding, Alike Of
Adults And Children, Was Less Injurious Than The Under-Feeding To Which
We Have Adverted As Now So General? Is It That The Deficient Clothing
Which This Delusive Hardening-Theory Has Encouraged, Is To Blame? Is It
That The Greater Or Less Discouragement Of Juvenile Sports, In Deference
To A False Refinement Is The Cause? From Our Reasonings It May Be
Inferred That Each Of These Has Probably Had A Share In Producing The
Evil.[7] But There Has Been Yet Another Detrimental Influence At Work,
Perhaps More Potent Than Any Of The Others: We Mean--Excess Of Mental
Application.
On Old And Young, The Pressure Of Modern Life Puts A Still-Increasing
Strain. In All Businesses And Professions, Intenser Competition Taxes
The Energies And Abilities Of Every Adult; And, To Fit The Young To Hold
Their Places Under This Intenser Competition, They Are Subject To
Severer Discipline Than Heretofore. The Damage Is Thus Doubled. Fathers,
Who Find Themselves Run Hard By Their Multiplying Competitors, And,
While Labouring Under This Disadvantage, Have To Maintain A More
Expensive Style Of Living, Are All The Year Round Obliged To Work Early
And Late, Taking Little Exercise And Getting But Short Holidays. The
Constitutions Shaken By This Continued Over-Application, They Bequeath
Comments (0)