Foul Play, Dion Boucicault [english novels for students .txt] 📗

the sudden appearance of a human hand, in a place and in a manner well adapted to shake the stoutest laundress’s nerves.

This hand came through the brick-work of the chimney-place, and there remained a moment or two. Then slowly retired, and as it retired something was heard to fall upon the shavings and tinsel of the fireplace.

Nancy, by a feminine impulse, put her hands before her face, to hide this supernatural hand; and, when she found courage to withdraw them, and glare at the place, there was no aperture whatever in the brick-work; and, consequently, the hand appeared to have traversed the solid material, both coming and going.

“Oh, Mr. Penfold,” cried Nancy; “I’m a sinful woman. This comes of talking of the Devil arter sunset;” and she sat trembling so that the very floor shook.

Mr. Penfold’s nerves were not strong. He and Nancy both huddled together for mutual protection, and their faces had not a vestige of color left in them.

However, after a period of general paralysis, Penfold whispered:

“I heard it drop something on the shavings.”

“Then we shall be all in a blaze o’ brimstone,” shrieked Nancy, wringing her hands.

And they waited to see.

Then, as no conflagration took place, Mr. Penfold got up, and said he must go and see what it was the hand had dropped.

Nancy, in whom curiosity was beginning to battle with terror, let him go to the fireplace without a word of objection, and then cried out:

“Don’t go anigh it, sir; it will do you a mischief; don’t touch, it whatever. Take the tongs.”

He took the tongs, and presently flung into the middle of the room a small oilskin packet. This, as it lay on the ground, they both eyed like two deer glowering at a piece of red cloth, and ready to leap back over the moon if it should show signs of biting. But oilskin is not preternatural, nor has tradition connected it, however remotely, with the Enemy of man.

Consequently, a great revulsion took place in Nancy, and she passed from fear to indignation at having been frightened so.

She ran to the fireplace, and, putting her head up the chimney, screamed, “Heave your dirt where you heave your love, ye Brazen!”

While she was objurgating her neighbor, whom, with feminine justice, she held responsible for every act done in her house, Penfold undid the packet, and Nancy returned to her seat, with her mind more at ease, to examine the contents.

“Banknotes!” cried Penfold.

“Ay,” said Nancy incredulously, “they do look like banknotes, and feel like ‘em; but they ain’t wrote like them. Banknotes ain’t wrote black like that in the left-hand corner.”

Penfold explained.

“Ten-pound notes are not, nor fives; but large notes are. These are all fifties.”

“Fifty whats?”

“Fifty pounds.”

“What, each of them bits of paper worth fifty pounds?”

“Yes. Let us count them; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18—Oh, Lord!—20. Why, that is two thousand pounds—just two thousand pounds. It is the very sum that ruined me; it did not belong to me, and it’s being in the house ruined my poor Robert. And this does not belong to you. Lock all the doors, bar all the windows, and burn them before the police come.”

“Wait a bit,” said Nancy—“wait a bit.” They sat on each side of the notes; Penfold agitated and terrified, Nancy confounded and perplexed.

 

CHAPTER LVIII.

 

PUNCTUALLY at ten o’clock Helen returned to Frith Street, and found Mr. Undercliff behind a sort of counter, employed is tracing; a workman was seated at some little distance from him; both bent on their work.

“Mr. Undercliff?” said Helen.

He rose and turned toward her politely—a pale, fair man, with a keen gray eye and a pleasant voice and manner; “I am Edward Undercliff. You come by appointment?”

“Yes, sir.”

“A question of handwriting?”

“Not entirely, sir. Do you remember giving witness in favor of a young clergyman, Mr. Robert Penfold, who was accused of forgery?”

“I remember the circumstance, but not the details.”

“Oh, dear! that is unfortunate,” said Helen, with a deep sigh; she often had to sigh now.

“Why, you see,” said the expert, “I am called on such a multitude of trials. However, I take notes of the principal ones. What year was it in?”

“In 1864.”

Mr. Undercliff went to a set of drawers arranged chronologically, and found his notes directly. “It was a forged bill, madam, indorsed and presented by Penfold. I was called to prove that the bill was not in the handwriting of Penfold. Here is my fac-simile of the Robert Penfold indorsed upon the bill by the prisoner.” He handed it her, and she examined it with interest.

“And here are fac-similes of genuine writing by John Wardlaw; and here is a copy of the forged note.”

He laid it on the table before her. She started, and eyed it with horror. It was a long time before she could speak. At length she said, “And that wicked piece of paper destroyed Robert Penfold.”

“Not that piece of paper, but the original; this is a fac-simile, so far as the writing is concerned. It was not necessary in this case to imitate paper and color. Stay, here is a sheet on which I have lithographed the three styles; that will enable you to follow my comparison. But perhaps that would not interest you.” Helen had the tact to say it would. Thus encouraged, the expert showed her that Robert Penfold’s writing had nothing in common with the forged note. He added: “I also detected in the forged note habits which were entirely absent from the true writing of John Wardlaw. You will understand there were plenty of undoubted specimens in court to go by.”

“Then, oh, sir,” said Helen, “Robert Penfold was not guilty.”

“Certainly not of writing the forged note. I swore that, and I’ll swear it again. But when it came to questions whether he had passed the note, and whether he knew it was forged, that was quite out of my province.”

“I can understand that,” said Helen; “but you heard the trial; you are very intelligent, sir, you must have formed some opinion as to whether he was guilty or not.”

The expert shook his head. “Madam,” said he, “mine is a profound and difficult art, which aims at certainties. Very early in my career I found that to master that art I must be single-minded, and not allow my ear to influence my eye. By purposely avoiding all reasoning from external circumstances, I have distanced my competitors in expertise; but I sometimes think I have rather weakened my powers of conjecture through disuse. Now, if my mother had been at the trial, she would give you an opinion of some value on the outside facts. But that is not my line. If you feel sure he was innocent, and want me to aid you, you must get hold of the handwriting of every person who was likely to know old Wardlaw’s handwriting, and so might have imitated it; all the clerks in his office, to begin with. Nail the forger; that is your only chance.”

“What, sir!” said Helen, with surprise, “if you saw the true handwriting of the person who wrote that forged note, should you recognize it?”

“Why not? It is difficult; but I have done it hundreds of times.”

“Oh! Is forgery so common?”

“No. But I am in all the cases; and, besides, I do a great deal in a business that requires the same kind of expertise—anonymous letters. I detect assassins of that kind by the score. A gentleman or lady, down in the country, gets a poisoned arrow by the post, or perhaps a shower of them. They are always in disguised handwriting; those who receive them send them up to me, with writings of all the people they suspect. The disguise is generally more or less superficial; five or six unconscious habits remain below it, and often these undisguised habits are the true characteristics of the writer. And I’ll tell you something curious, madam; it is quite common for all the suspected people to be innocent; and then I write back, ‘Send me the handwriting of the people you suspect the least;’ and among them I often find the assassin.”

“Oh, Mr. Undercliff,” said Helen, “you make my heart sick.”

“Oh, it is a vile world, for that matter,” said the expert; “and the country no better than the town, for all it looks so sweet with its green fields and purling rills. There they sow anonymous letters like barley. The very girls write anonymous letters that make my hair stand on end. Yes, it is a vile world.”

“Don’t you believe him, miss,” said Mrs. Undercliff, appearing suddenly. Then, turning to her son, “How can you measure the world? You live in a little one of your own—a world of forgers and anonymous writers; you see so many of these, you fancy they are common as dirt; but they are only common to you because they all come your way.”

“Oh, that is it, is it?” said the expert, doubtfully.

“Yes, that is it, Ned,” said the old lady, quietly. Then after a pause she said “I want you to do your very best for this young lady.”

“I always do,” said the artist. “But how can I judge without materials? And she brings me none.”

Mrs. Undercliff turned to Helen, and said: “Have you brought him nothing at all, no handwritings—in your bag?”

Then Helen sighed again. “I have no handwriting except Mr. Penfold’s; but I have two printed reports of the trial.”

“Printed reports,” said the expert, “they are no use to me. Ah! here is an outline I took of the prisoner during the trial. You can read faces. Tell the lady whether he was guilty or not,” and he handed the profile to his mother with an ironical look; not that he doubted her proficiency in the rival art of reading faces, but that he doubted the existence of the art.

Mrs. Undercliff took the profile, and, coloring slightly, said to Miss Rolleston: “It is living faces I profess to read. There I can see the movement of the eyes and other things that my son here has not studied.” Then she scrutinized the profile. “It is a very handsome face,” said she.

The expert chuckled. “There’s a woman’s judgment,” said he. “Handsome! the fellow I got transported for life down at Exeter was an Adonis, and forged wills, bonds, and powers of attorney by the dozen.”

“There’s something noble about this face,” said Mrs. Undercliff, ignoring the interruption, “and yet something simple. I think him more likely to be a cat’s-paw than a felon.” Having delivered this with a certain modest dignity, she laid the profile on the counter before Helen.

The expert had a wonderful eye and hand; it was a good thing for society he had elected to be gamekeeper instead of poacher, detector of forgery instead of forger. No photograph was ever truer than this outline. Helen started, and bowed her head over the sketch to conceal the strong and various emotions that swelled at sight of the portrait of her martyr. In vain; if the eyes were hidden, the tender bosom heaved, the graceful body quivered, and the tears fell fast upon the counter.

Mrs. Undercliff was womanly enough, though she looked like the late Lord Thurlow in petticoats; and she instantly aided the girl to hide her beating heart from the man, though that man was her son. She distracted his attention.

“Give me all your notes, Ned,” said she, “and let me see whether I can make something of them; but first perhaps Miss Rolleston will empty her bag on the counter. Go back to your