readenglishbook.com » Other » Birth Control, Halliday G. Sutherland [classic books for 11 year olds txt] 📗

Book online «Birth Control, Halliday G. Sutherland [classic books for 11 year olds txt] 📗». Author Halliday G. Sutherland



1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22
Go to page:
Ireland, although the general prosperity of the people has rapidly increased since George Wyndham displaced landlordism over a large area by small ownership, the birthrate has continued to rise. Moreover, the danger to national existence, as we have already indicated (Chapter I, Section. 10) is greater from moral than from physical catastrophes, and when both catastrophes are threatened the ultimate issue depends upon which of the two is the greater. Furthermore, it would appear that moral catastrophes inevitably lead to physical catastrophes. This is best illustrated by the fate of ancient Greece.

 

Section 4. ILLUSTRATED FROM GREEK HISTORY [Reference: Dangers]

The appositeness of this illustration arises from the fact that ancient Greece reached a very high level of material and intellectual civilisation, yet perished owing to moral and physical disasters.

(a) Moral Catastrophe in Ancient Greece

The evidence of the moral catastrophe is to be found in the change that occurred in the Greek character most definitely after the fourth century before Christ. Of this Mr. W.H.S. Jones has given the following account:

 

“Gradually the Greeks lost their brilliance, which had been as the

bright freshness of early youth. This is painfully obvious in their

literature, if not in other forms of art. Their initiative vanished;

they ceased to create and began to comment. Patriotism, with rare

exceptions, became an empty name, for few had the high spirit and

energy to translate into action man’s duty to the State. Vacillation,

indecision, fitful outbursts of unhealthy activity followed by cowardly

depression, selfish cruelty, and criminal weakness are characteristic

of the public life of Greece from the struggle with Macedonia to the

final conquest by the arms of Rome. No one can fail to be struck by the

marked difference between the period from Marathon to the Peloponnesian

War and the period from Alexander to Mummius. Philosophy also suffered,

and became deeply pessimistic even in the hands of its best and noblest

exponents. ‘Absence of feeling,’ ‘absence of care’—such were the

highest goals of human endeavour.

 

“How far this change was due to other causes is a complicated question.

The population may have suffered from foreign admixture during the

troubled times that followed the death of Alexander. There were,

however, many reasons against the view that these disturbances produced

any appreciable difference of race. The presence of vast numbers of

slaves, not members of households, but the gangs of toilers whom the

increase of commerce brought into the country, pandered to a foolish

pride that looked upon many kinds of honourable labour as being

shameful and unbecoming to a free man. The very institution that made

Greek civilisation possible encouraged idleness, luxury, and still

worse vices. Unnatural vice, which in some States seems to have been

positively encouraged, was prevalent among the Greeks to an almost

incredible extent. It is hard not to believe that much physical harm

was caused thereby; of the loss to moral strength and vigour there is

no need to speak. The city-state, again, however favourable to the

development of public spirit and a sense of responsibility, was doomed

to fail in a struggle against the stronger Powers of Macedon and Rome.

The growth of the scientific spirit destroyed the old religion. The

more intellectual tried to find principles of conduct in philosophy;

the ignorant or half-educated, deprived of the strong moral support

that always comes from sharing the convictions of those abler and wiser

than oneself, fell back upon degrading superstitions. In either case

there was a serious loss of that spirit of self-sacrifice and devotion

which a vigorous religious faith alone can bestow. Without such a

spirit, as history proves conclusively, no nation or people can

survive.” [57]

(b) The Physical Catastrophe induced by Selfishness

One of the physical catastrophes that probably most accelerated the fall of Greek civilisation was malarial fever. The parasite of this disease is carried from man to man by Anopheline mosquitoes. These insects, during the stage of egg, larva, and nympha, live in water, and afterwards, as developed insects, in the air. The breeding-grounds, where the eggs are laid, are shallow pools of stagnant water. For that reason the disease is most common in marshy country, and tends to disappear when the land is properly drained. Of this we have an example in England, whence malaria disappeared as the marshes were drained.

In Homer there is a disputed reference to malaria, but it is not possible to ascertain whether the disease was present during the rise of Greek civilisation, and there are no references to this disease in the literature from 700 B.C. to 550 B.C. [58] From this date references to malaria gradually become more frequent, and Hippocrates stated that “those who live in low, moist, hot districts, and drink the stagnant water, of necessity suffer from enlarged spleen. They are stunted and ill-shaped, fleshy and dark, bilious rather than phlegmatic. Their nature is to be cowardly and adverse from hardship; but good discipline can improve their character in this respect.” [59] After an exhaustive study of the literature, Mr. Jones concludes “that malaria was endemic throughout the greater part of the Greek world by 400 B.C.”

Concerning the causes of a malarial epidemic, Sir Ronald Ross writes: [60] “Suppose that the Anophelines have been present from the first, but that the number of infected immigrants has been few. Then, possibly, some of these people have happened to take up their abode in places where the mosquitoes are rare; others may have recovered quickly; others may not have chanced to possess parasites in suitable stages when they have been bitten. Thus, the probability of their spreading infection would be very small. Or, supposing even that some few new infections have been caused, yet, by our rough calculations in section 12, unless the mosquitoes are sufficiently numerous in the locality, the little epidemic may die out after a while—for instance, during the cool season.” The italics are mine, because some writers have suggested that the decline of Greece was due to malaria, whereas I submit, as the more logical interpretation of the facts, that a moral catastrophe led to the neglect of agriculture, whereby the area of marshy land became more extensive, mosquitoes more numerous, and the fever more prevalent.

In view of the foregoing facts, the following Malthusian statement, although groundless, is nevertheless an amusing example of the errors that arise from lack of a little knowledge:

 

“The difficulty of providing for a high birthrate in a settled

community was appreciated by the ancient Greeks, notably by Plato and

Aristotle; but their conclusions were swept aside by the warlike spirit

of Rome, and the sentimentality of Christianity, so that only a few

isolated thinkers showed any appreciation of them.” [61]

[Footnote 51: Quoted in The Law of Births and Deaths, by Charles Edward Pell, 1921, chap. xii.]

[Footnote 52: The Law of Births and Deaths, 1921.]

[Footnote 53: Ibid., p. 40.]

[Footnote 54: The Law of Births and Deaths, 1921, p. 41.]

[Footnote 55: Ibid., p. 40.]

[Footnote 56: Dr. John Brownlee, The Declining Birthrate, p. 156.]

[Footnote 57: Malaria and Greek History, 1909, pp. 102 et seq.]

[Footnote 58: Ibid., p. 26.]

[Footnote 59: Ibid., p. 85.]

[Footnote 60: Report on the Prevention of Malaria in Mauritius, p. 51.]

[Footnote 61: C.V. Drysdale, O.B.E., D. Sc., The Malthusian Doctrine and its Modern Aspects, p. 3.]

CHAPTER VI

THE FALLING BIRTHRATE IN ENGLAND: ITS CAUSES

Birth controllers claim that the fall in the English birthrate, which began to decline in 1876, is mostly due to the use of contraceptives: but the very fact that this claim is made by these reckless propagandists makes it imperative that we should scrutinise the evidence very carefully.

 

Section 1. NOT, AS MALTHUSIANS ASSERT, DUE MAINLY TO CONTRACEPTIVES

In support of the Malthusian contention, Dr. C.V. Drysdale, who is not a doctor of medicine but a doctor of science, has published the following statements:

 

“… We might note that a recent investigation of the records of the

Quakers (the Society of Friends) reveals the fact that family

limitation has been adopted by them to a most astonishing extent. Their

birthrate [_sic_] stood at 20 per thousand in 1876, and has now

actually fallen to about 8 per thousand. The longevity of Quakers is

well known, and the returns of deaths given by their Society show that

the great majority live to between seventy and ninety years. Infantile

mortality is practically unknown among them, although none of the

special steps so dear to most social reformers have been taken for the

protection of infant life. The Quakers are well known to be very

earnest Christians, and to give the best example of religious morality.

Their probity in business and their self-sacrifice in humanitarian work

of all kinds are renowned. Yet it would seem that they have adopted

family restriction to a greater extent than any other body of people,

and, since the decline of their birthrate only began in 1876, that it

is due to adoption of preventive methods.” [62]

Again, he translates the following quotation from a Swiss author:

 

“In France a national committee has been formed which has as its object

an agitation for the increase of the population. Upon this committee

these [? there] sit, besides President Poincar�, who, although married,

has no children, twenty-four senators and litt�rateurs. These

twenty-five persons, who preach to their fellow citizens by word and

pen, have between them nineteen children, or not one child on the

average per married couple. Similarly, a Paris journal

(_Intransigeant_, August and September, 1908) had the good idea of

publishing four hundred and forty-five names of the chief Parisian

personalities who are never tired of lending their names in support of

opposition to the artificial restriction of families. I give these

figures briefly without the names, which have no special interest for

us. Anyone interested in the names can consult the paper well known in

upper circles. Among them:

 

176 married couples had 0 children = 0 children

106 ” ” ” 1 child = 106 “

88 ” ” ” 2 children = 176 “

 

40 ” ” ” 3 ” = 120 “

19 ” ” ” 4 ” = 76 “

7 ” ” ” 5 ” = 35 “

4 ” ” ” 6 ” = 24 “

3 ” ” ” 7 ” = 21 “

1 ” ” ” 9 ” = 9 “

1 ” ” ” 11 ” = 11 “

 

Total 445 with 578

 

That is, an average one and a third children per couple, while each

single one of these families could much more easily have supported

twenty children than a working-class family a single child.”

“Comment on the above is superfluous,” adds Dr. C.V. Drysdale, and with that remark most people will cordially disagree. The obvious interpretation of the foregoing figures is that there has been a decline in natural fertility amongst highly educated and civilised people. But that interpretation does not suit Dr. Drysdale’s book, and hence we have the disgraceful spectacle of a writer who, in order to bolster up an argument which is rotten from beginning to end, does not hesitate to launch without a particle of evidence a charge of gross hypocrisy against the Quakers of England, a body of men and women who in peace and in war have proved the sincerity of their faith, and against four hundred and seventy respected citizens of Paris. Further comment on that is superfluous. At the same time it is obvious that, in so far as their pernicious propaganda spreads and is adopted, Malthusians may claim to contribute to the fall of the birthrate, and towards the decline of the Empire.

 

Section 2. DECLINE IN FERTILITY DUE TO SOME NATURAL LAW

In the course of an inquiry on the fertility of women

1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22
Go to page:

Free e-book «Birth Control, Halliday G. Sutherland [classic books for 11 year olds txt] 📗» - read online now

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet. You can be the first!
Add a comment