The Global Elites Population Cull, Terence Smart [classic book list .txt] 📗

of the people? Why is the sale and possession of cigarettes still even legal? I wouldn’t normally raise these questions quite so fiercely, but the ever-increasing panicky bossiness of the authorities is annoying me. I must ask them: are you really worried about our health, or are you just afraid of being blamed for a small number of the deaths that your policies are causing? But I am quite sure that many of the current panic measures do far more harm than good. They create the idea that we are in the midst of a terrifying plague that will kill us all, when the truth – though disturbing – is far less frightening. Their worst effect is to savage the economy by scaring people away from normal activities. But while I see very little evidence of a pandemic, and much more of a PanicDemic, I can witness on my daily round the slow strangulation of dozens of small businesses near where I live and work, and the catastrophic collapse of a flourishing society, all these things brought on by a Government policy made out of fear and speculation rather than thought. Much that is closing may never open again. The time lost to schoolchildren and university students – in debt for courses which have simply ceased to be taught – is irrecoverable, just as the jobs which are being wiped out will not reappear when the panic at last subsides. We are told that we must emulate Italy or China, but there is no evidence that the flailing, despotic measures taken in these countries reduced the incidence of coronavirus. The most basic error in science is to assume that because B happens after A that B was caused by A” - Peter Hitchens, English conservative journalist and author. Hitchens writes for The Mail on Sunday and is a former foreign correspondent in Moscow and Washington

Remember: there are two types of infectious disease: the very dangerous such as Ebola and the rest such as the flu. The coronavirus was originally placed in the same category as Ebola. The Government’s advisors have now downgraded it and put it in the flu category. Are we to assume that we will be put into lockdown whenever a new flu virus appears?

Just think of all those now being denied essential screening, scanning, treatment and surgery while the UK NHS (and other countries health services) devotes itself to an infectious disease in the same epidemiological bracket as the flu. Think of all those who will have heart attacks because they are eating badly and not exercising. I am convinced the `cure’ will do more damage than the `disease’.

The Government published an `Emergency bill to strengthen coronavirus (covid19) response plans’. The new Bill, gives the Government tremendous powers including `easing legislative and regulatory requirements'. The bill is 358 pages long and, for a start, lasts two years. (They didn’t write a 358 page Bill in a week, did they? How long have they been working on this?) The police and immigration officers will also have new powers. Shouldn’t these powers be removed once this Virus crisis is over? I doubt it very much.

“How long before we need passes to go out in the streets, as in any other banana republic? As for the grotesque, bullying powers to be created on Monday, I can only tell you that you will hate them like poison by the time they are imposed on you. Imagine, police officers forcing you to be screened for a disease, and locking you up for 48 hours if you object. Is this China or Britain? Think how this power could be used against, literally, anybody. The Bill also gives Ministers the authority to ban mass gatherings. It will enable police and public health workers to place restrictions on a person’s ‘movements and travel’, ‘activities’ and ‘contact with others’. Many court cases will now take place via video-link, and if a coroner suspects someone has died of coronavirus there will be no inquest. They say this is temporary. They always do” – Peter Jonathan Hitchens is an English conservative journalist and author. Hitchens writes for The Mail on Sunday and is a former foreign correspondent in Moscow and Washington

Belarus has been one of the few nations in the northern hemisphere to resist introducing nation-wide quarantines and other large-scale restrictions in its battle with the new coronavirus, instead preferring a targeted response. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has expressed concerns over how powerful nations and interests may try to use the coronavirus pandemic to reshape the world to their own advantage.

“I once asked the question: is this pandemic, this coronavirus, a man-made phenomenon? I don’t know the answer yet, but I have my suspicions. Are politicians and others using this situation for their own purposes? You and I both know the answer to that question. You already see how it is used today…Doesn’t it seem to you that the powerful forces of the world would like to remake the world, without a ‘war’ (Emmanuel Macron has already called it a war), through this so-called ‘corona-psychosis’, or ‘info-demic’? Many people are asking: ‘what will happen after the pandemic?’” Lukashenko said.

The country of Belarus carried on as normal, they played (and attended) football matches and Ice Hockey games. They went to work as normal, there was no social distancing. As of May 25th 2020, a total of 204 people have died from the disease. The UK population is about seven times bigger than Belarus, therefore, we would expect a death rate of “about” 1,450 people, or even less as we carried out the (So called) needed health measures. No but we social distanced, wore masks, closed the whole country down and yet still 40,000 people died of Covid-19 in the U.K, or so they tell us.

40,000 people in the U.K have not died of a new deadly virus called Covid-19. About 30,000 of those people have died of normal causes such as heart disease, Cancer, Flu etc., but they have been re-assigned as dying from Covid-19. Let’s say someone has died of cancer but they also had the flu as well so they put flu down on their death certificate as the cause of death. That is a deception but that is what is happening.

“I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life — schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned — will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself. The stock market will bounce back in time, but many businesses never will. The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order” - Dr. David Katz is an American physician and founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center

Over the course of just a few weeks, America and most of the world has been subjected to a power play that rivals anything that George Orwell and his book 1984 could have dreamed up. Whole countries locked down. People quarantined who have no illness. People restricted to their houses. “Social distancing” mandating that people stay six feet apart from one another. The closing down of virtually all businesses. No more going to the movies, or restaurants, or casinos, or concerts or even sports.

For those who say there is no global conspiracy to control the masses. You’re wrong, you are now living in it. A few Globalists have got maybe 5 or 6 billion people to stay in their houses under threat of a supposed virus that has maybe killed 70,000 at most because the official figure of 500,000 is a lie.

Another fundamental question: What is being tested?

I know of instances where elderly people who are in hospital in Italy with heart and lung conditions and they get tested positive for a Coronavirus then they die. But it goes down on their death certificate as death by Covid-19 and not by the heart or lung condition that they were originally in the hospital for.

Take note of the following picture.

“Here in the UK my daughter developed flu-like symptoms recently. When she phoned 111 (the NHS helpline) she was told she had covid19 and must self-isolate for 7 days. Despite the fact that she was not tested for anything, my daughter's details were placed on the NHS register of people who supposedly had covid19. This is happening to just about everyone in the UK who reports having flu-like symptoms, so the official figures are totally misleading”.

Above Youtube comment for the video, Is covid-19 real?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvLx17NNlu0&feature=youtu.be

The role of the media

Most traditional media, almost all of which are part of elite geopolitical networks, decided to run a campaign of fear during the coronavirus period, a behavior that is usually observed in connection with wars of aggression or alleged terrorist attacks.

The risk to the general population was greatly exaggerated, official policies were hardly questioned, the situation in hospitals was dramatized, manipulative images were used, campaigns were staged, and protesters were systematically defamed as “idiots”.

It is true that some conservative media criticized the economically harmful lockdown measures. The real question, however, is whether they will also criticize the surveillance measures now planned, such as the extensive societal contact tracing).

Most independent media sooner or later realized that the risk of the corona virus was exaggerated and politically exploited. Only a few independent media outlets did not realize this, perhaps because they lacked a medical background or fell for the official campaign of fear.

Some analysts compared Covid-19 to a psychological operation that uses the media-induced fear of the virus to bring about political and social change.

US platforms such as Google, Youtube, Facebook and Twitter (all owned by Jews) censored corona issues extensively by deleting critical (i.e. non WHO compliant) points of view even from doctors or restricting their distribution, a procedure that has long been the norm for geopolitical issues.

However, modern media users have the option of using manipulation-free search engines such as DuckDuckGo and independent video platforms such as Bitchute, as well as generally using an advertising and tracking blocker on certain media sites.

Coronavirus Fails Koch’s Postulates

The following article is by Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett (Rosemary has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary) at off-guardian.org.

About 150 years ago, scientists painstakingly constructed a set of principles that can prove whether a particular microbe is the cause of a specific disease or is just a bystander. Those three principles are known as the Koch postulates.

From all the available information, the novel coronavirus doesn’t appear to meet any of these tenets, never mind all three.

Like most human endeavours, the Koch postulates were the product of collaboration. First, Jakob Henle developed the underlying concepts, and then Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler spent decades refining them until they were published in 1890. The resulting three postulates are:

1. The pathogen occurs in every case of the disease in question and under circumstances that can account for the pathological changes and clinical course of the disease.

2. The causative microorganism occurs in no other disease as a fortuitous and nonpathogenic parasite.

3. After being fully isolated from the body and grown in tissue culture (or cloned), it can induce the disease anew.

The principles have been altered almost beyond recognition by various researchers over the ensuing 130 years. But the changes concomitantly watered down the postulates. That’s why they’re still used today by most researchers seeking to robustly prove or disprove the existence of a