The planet of biorobots?, Alexander Borodin [top 100 novels .TXT] 📗

state A sick, poor, illegitimate and aggressive - is it that the people of state A overthrow their government, and it began to control state B? Some advocate overcoming difficulties and hardships, although they themselves do not strive for this, they simply form personalities that will feed and support them, overcoming hardships and hardships, but no one says that it is bad, there are extremophiles who are ready to give themselves to hardships and enjoy overcoming them?

 

"Who in his youth did not was a revolutionary - in fact there is no heart . Who in old age does not become a conservative - in fact do not have the brains. " Words attributed to Winston Churchill.               

Any feature film is based on reality. The essence of some people is the same regardless of country, political system and historical time, compare the speech of a lawyer at the funeral after the death of the mafia leader, Professor Ramonte , in the TV series “ La Piovra ” ( Italy, 1984-2001) and the speech of the head of the scientific Agatov’s group after the death in the plane crash of a young scientist Richard in the film “Going to a Thunderstorm” (USSR, 1965), the rhetoric is the same.

 

An adult cannot be an idealist; can he only pretend to be able to earn money on this? There are no idealists among those over 40, otherwise it is a mental illness? Anything that does not promote communication with people and the so-called integration into society is considered to be a mental illness? There are many professions that protect the rights and interests of people - does it happen that high ideals are just a “screen” to “cut down” more money? What is it to take sides with a writer, we publish the book “Country of bad luck” or vice versa “Country of luck”, depending on which side it took and who pays for it? Everyone has prison and freedom only in his head? Always more interesting to study evil than good? Is journalism sometimes a direct saying and a public “undressing” in front of everyone in a moral sense? If someone’s book is constructive in nature, will it be published in the country where its author lives, if the book is destructive, will it be sent to the country of the geopolitical opponent of the author’s country, if, of course, there is such a country? Why is the poet, according to stereotypes, akin to the one who is called a loafer? I heard on one of the many radio stations the poet’s son’s performance: “My father did not know how to do anything in everyday life, he was a real poet.” You can’t take this guy with the so-called propaganda of the fact that you can’t be ashamed to do anything, he is proud that his father did not know how to do anything, is he himself a propagandist? He cannot earn normal money, what is non-self-sufficiency - is this incapacity for initiative? Is everything called psychotechnology and manipulation aimed at protecting the interests of those who do not want to work physically? I have nothing against physical labor, but my relative, not physically working himself, sent me to work where I needed to work, for example, as a helper, take a closer look at someone who teaches you that you need to work physically, such in most cases you don’t work physically? Not a poet, but a propagandist, not a musician, but a propagandist, not a writer, but a propagandist, poet, writer, writer, and musician to a musician, are there poets, writers, and musicians who act by order of some politicians or their services? Most people are inspired, sing what you sing, compose what you compose, if only this would contribute to the poor mood of the population of some countries, and we will pay for it, what’s called the psychological war of some states against others, is this factor not taken into account by psychologists? Are there poets, musicians, etc. who, for money and for the promotion of their works by some authorities, push people (mainly young people from single-parent families or from so-called dysfunctional families) to actions harmful to these people? Sometimes parents say that you will understand later, but it will be too late, some politics and places associated with it (some army, some so-called propaganda music industry, etc.), this is where they can go, who all understood late, but who wants to eat and relax better than most? It is beneficial for countries that have countries - geopolitical opponents - that the citizens of these countries - geopolitical opponents are those who are called drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally abnormal, and that they are outside the comfort zone and that their country has the opposite, that citizens are athletes and led a healthy lifestyle? Political radio stations and other media outlets of countries called geopolitical opponents of the country in which you live (if the country you live in) is it propaganda of any hu ... Lebanese activity that includes people from the so-called incomplete or dysfunctional family? Do you have pros and cons everywhere? Thanks to those who destroyed the USSR, a freebie called “ Aizul ” (asylum) with a free apartment ended , now just the fact that you are from a totalitarian country that is considered to be someone is not enough, you need proof that you are persecuted if this is not, then deportation home from a country considered by someone to be democratic? Pay attention to what they feed you, promises or food? The media of countries - geopolitical opponents (countries - fighters for influence on people and fighters for territory) broadcast that the country, for example, in which you live (if it has opponents), is bad in all respects, however, except for propaganda about that everything is bad, do not give anything? Are special services of some countries taking part in the formation of the personality of people? A country is a geopolitical opponent, for example, of your country (if your country has such) does not give you anything, neither money, nor food, nor clothes, nor free education, nor free medicine, nor the citizenship of its country, where, for example, a high standard of living , and nothing else in the material plane, it gives only the “burden”, propaganda, and, as already mentioned, it cannot just give you the citizenship of its rich country, because if you give it to everyone, it can cease to be rich, because will many mouths come? All people are initially equal, there is no concept of “mob” considered offensive, the higher the standard of living, the more educated, with higher education people? Some mass media of some rich countries broadcast to some poor countries in order to preserve the rich lifestyle of the people who live in these countries and are not interested in anything else? It is impossible in a poor country to do what is possible in a rich country, because the country is not rich, unless the rich share their wealth with the poor? The task of some units of some special services - the creation of mental instability among citizens from countries that are competitors to the citizens of the country whose interests are these special services? Cognitive dissonance can be when you feel, being with someone nearby, “squeezed”, but you do not want to be that way when you do not want to see yourself as you are, or when you want to quit some kind of work , which you don’t like, but you can’t, for example, because of fear that you won’t get anywhere else? Are cognitive dissonance and psychological instability smoothed out by psychostimulants ? If you drink alcohol to calm you down, then you can stop drinking it anymore, just react to everything in the same way that you would react when you were drunk - anyway? If you used to drink alcohol because of the excitement for the fact that you seemed to make the wrong decision, then make, sober, the same decisions that you would have made by drinking 200 grams of vodka, but don’t drink it on really? Is ideological flashing and firmware, psychological warfare, in particular, the creation by the population of those who need it and are profitable, needs without the possibility of meeting them? The fact that you will make decisions, imagining that you are drunk, will not provoke a clash with external dangers, because in fact you will be sober? Man is a programmed creature, and his genes are a programming environment, does everything look like a programmer’s work tools? How to stabilize the psyche without psychostimulants ? How to cancel a resuscitation tour? Psychology should not be universal, but separate for each case? In each country, is psychology “imprisoned” for its standard of living? If there are needs, is there a choice either to satisfy them and learn to defend your lifestyle, or to cultivate in yourself what is called willpower to suppress them? What about those who are in prison as prisoners, what is their psychological state and how do they understand the phrase “willpower” and the phrase “nurturing willpower”? Those who are in prison, a priori, have what is called willpower, and they do not have psychological problems, like some of those who are free? In freedom, bring freedom from what is called addiction? In countries that are considered rich, do not really need what is called willpower and fortitude, since there is the opportunity to satisfy almost all needs and not deny yourself anything? Again about those whom some call the music video generation, infantilism is a misunderstanding of reality, one of its signs is the belief that everything is decided by acquaintances, not the law, some will go to deal with the problems themselves, through “connections”, after why nothing will come of it, or they will be sent to jail for “independent activities” and they will have to reconsider their views, others will write a statement to the police? In countries that are considered rich, there is no concept of “infantilism”, which implies the so-called adult behavior, there is no need to grow up? In some poor countries, is psychology sometimes cunning and, probably, manipulating by creating an inferiority complex, using, for example, the term “infantilism”, since some poor countries cannot afford people who do not want to be held responsible for something? In some poor country, if you don’t go to work, do not feed your family, then you are infantile? In some places, people who can be called infantiles govern people , but they do everything so that there are no infantiles among the governed, otherwise they will not survive? Does everyone have something that annoys him and something that relaxes him? Is there a dangerous and non-dangerous obsession in every sense? Not to encode (meaning a psychiatric understanding of coding, coding from drinking), but to exchange an obsession with alcohol for another obsession? In documentaries, they say that Adolf Hitler drank alcohol and smoked before becoming what he became - he drank and smoked until he became obsessed with politics, or he was obsessed with power when he drank alcohol and smoked, but at that moment he didn’t find a way by which he could realize his needs, or was it not like that, and so they talk about him because he made many enemies? Can people drink alcohol and obsessed while they are looking for ways to fulfill their needs? Are psychiatrists who must make hormones of pleasure produce the endocrine system? The task of a psychiatrist is to make endorphins (pleasure hormones) be produced and suppress what causes discomfort? They say that the richer the country, the more so-called non-independent, mentally abnormal and strange people (mentally abnormal and strange, if compared with the traditional coordinate system of normalities)? What did Spengler have in mind in his work “Sunset in Europe”, he was 100% right, but he expressed everything in hyperbole? All books of philosophers, etc. are aimed at solving the issue of increasing the production of pleasure hormones in one who has few of them? Many politicians, philosophers, psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists and many others have been struggling for many years about this: how to make a person, speaking a literary and everyday language, happy or, speaking a biological and medical language, how to make hormones to produce the human endocrine system, how to do so so that everyone is comfortable and there is social peace, because it comes when everyone or most is comfortable? Or you solve one problem, another appears - politicians or circumstances of some countries seem to have done their job perfectly in terms of improving the living standards of their citizens, but