An Essay On The Trial By Jury, Lysander Spooner [ebook reader browser .txt] 📗
- Author: Lysander Spooner
Book online «An Essay On The Trial By Jury, Lysander Spooner [ebook reader browser .txt] 📗». Author Lysander Spooner
The Fifth Amendment To The Constitution Of The United states Seems
To Have Been Framed on The Same Idea, Inasmuch As It Provides That
"No Person Shall Be Deprived of Life, Liberty, Or Property, Without
Chapter 2 (The Trial By Jury, As Defined by Magna Carta) Section 2 (The Language Of Magna Carta) Pg 36Due Process Of Law." [28]
Whether The Word Vel Should Be Rendered by Or, Or By And.
Having thus Given The Meanings, Or Rather The Applications, Which
The Words Vel Per Legem Terrae Will Reasonably, And Perhaps Must
Necessarily, Bear, It Is Proper To Suggest, That It Has Been Supposed
By Some That The Word Vel, Instead Of Being rendered by Or, As It
Usually Is, Ought To Be Rendered by And, Inasmuch As The Word Vel
Is Often Used for Et, And The Whole Phrase Nisi Per Judicium Parian
Suorun, Vel Per Legem Terrae, (Which Would Then Read, Unless By The
Sentence Of His Peers, And The Law Of The Land,) Would Convey A
More Intelligible And Harmonious Meaning than It Otherwise Does.
Blackstone Suggests That This May Be The True Reading. (Charters, P.
41.) Also Mr. Hallam, Who Says:"Nisi Per Legale Judicium Parium
Suorum, Vel Per Legem Terra;. Several Explanations Have Been
Offered of The Alternative Clause; Which Some Have Referred to
Judgment By Default, Or Demurrer; Others To The Process Of
Attachment For Contempt. Certainly There Are Many Legal
Procedures Besides Trial By Jury, Through Which A Party'S Goods Or
Person May Be Taken. But One May Doubt Whether These Were In
Contemplation Of The Framers Of Magna Carta. In an Entry Of The
Charter Of 1217 By A Contemporary Hand, Preserved in the
Town-Clerk'S Office In london, Called liber Custumarum Et
Regum Antiquarum, A Various Reading, Et Per Legem Terrae, Occurs.
Blackstone'S Charters, P. 42 (41.) And The Word Vel Is So Frequently
Used for Et, That I Amnot Wholly Free From A Suspicion That It Was
So Intended in this Place. The Meaning will Be, That No Person Shall
Be Disseized, &C;., Except Upon A Lawful Cause Of Action, Found By
The Verdict Of A Jury. This Really Seems As Good As Any Of The
Disjunctive Interpretatios; But I Do Not Offer It With Much
Confidence." 2 Hallam'S Middle Ages, Ch. 8, Part 2, P. 449,
Note." [29]
The Idea That The Word Vel, Should Be Rendered by And, Is
Corroborated, If Not Absolutely Confirmed, By The Following passage
In Blackstone, Which Has Before Been Cited. Speaking of The Trial
By Jury, As Established by Magna Carta, He Calls It, "A Privilege
Which Is Couched in almost The Same Words With That Of The
Emperor Conrad Two Hundred years Before: 'Nemo Beneficium
Suum Perdat, Nisi Secundum Consuetudinem Antecessorum
Nostrorum, Et, Judicium Parium Suorum. ' (No One Shall Lose His
Estate Unless According to The Custom Of Our Ancestors, And, The
Judgment Of His Peers.) 3 Blackstone, 350.,
If The Word Vel, Be Rendered by And,, (As I Think It Must Be, At Least
In Some Cases,) This Chapter Of Magna Carta Will Then Read That No
Freeman Shall Be Arrested or Punished, "Unless According to The
Sentence Of His Peers, And, The Law Of The Land."
The Difference Between This Reading and The Other Is Important. In
The One Case, There Would Be, At First View, Some Color Of Ground
Chapter 2 (The Trial By Jury, As Defined by Magna Carta) Section 2 (The Language Of Magna Carta) Pg 37For Saying that A Man Might Be Punished in either Of Two Ways, Viz.,
According to The Sentence Of His Peers, Or According to The Law Of
The Land. In the Other Case, It Requires Both The Sentence Of His Peers
And, The Law Of The Laud (Common Law) To Authorize His
Punishment.
If This Latter Reading be Adopted, The Provision Would Seem To
Exclude All Trials Except Trial By Jury, And All Causes Of Action
Except Those Of The Common Law.,
But I Apprehend The Word Vel, Must Be Rendered both By And,, And
By Or;, That In cases Of A Judgment,, It Should Be Rendered by And,,
So As To Require The Concurrence Both Of "The Judgment Of The Peers
And, The Law Of The Land," To Authorize The King to Make Execution
Upon A Party'S Goods Or Person; But That In cases Of Arrest And
Imprisonment, Simply For The Purpose Of Bringing a Man To Trial,
Vel, Should Be Rendered by Or, , Because There Can Have Been No
Judgment Of A Jury In such A Case, And "The Law Of The Land" Must
Therefore Necessarily Be The Only Guide To, And Restraint Upn, The
King. If This Guide And Restraint Were Taken Away, The King would
Be Invested with An Arbitrary And Most Dangerous Power In.
Making arrests, And Confining in prison, Under Pretence Of An
Intention To Bring to Trial.
Having thus Examined the Language Of This Chapter Of Magna Cart,
So Far As It Relates To Criminal Cases, Its Legal Import May Be Stated
As Follows, Viz.:
No Freeman Shall Be Arrested, Or Imprisoned, Or Deprived of His
Freehold, Or His Liberties, Or Free Customs, Or Be Outlawed, Or
Exiled, Or In any Manner Destroyed, (Harmed,) Nor Will We (The
King) Proceed. Against Him, Nor Send Any One Against Him, By Force
Or Arms, Unless According to (That Is, In execution. Of) The Sentence
Of His Peers, And (Or Or, As The Case May Require) The Common Law
Of England, (As It Was At The Time Of Magna Carta, In 1215.)
[1] Hume, Appendix 2,
[2] Crabbe'S History Of The English Law, 236.
[3] Coke Says, "The King of England Is Armed with Divers Councils,
One Whereof Is Called commune Concilium, (The Common Council,)
And That Is The Court Of Parliament And So It Is Legally Called in
Writs And Judicial Proceedings Comanche Concilium Regni
Anglicae, (The Common Council Of The Kingdom Of England.) And
Another Is Called magnum Concilium, (Great Council;) This Is
Sometimes Applied to The Upper House Of Parliament, And
Sometimes, Out Of Parliament Time, To The Peers Of The Realm, Lords
Of Parliament, Who Are Called magnum Concilium Regis, (The Great
Council Of The King;) [4] Thirdly, (As Every Man Knoweth,) The King
Hath A Privy Council For Matters Of State. * * The Fourth Council Of
The King are His Judges For Law Matters." 1 Coke'S Institutes, 110 A.
[4] The Great Charter Of Henry Iii., (1216 And 1225,) Confirmed by
Chapter 2 (The Trial By Jury, As Defined by Magna Carta) Section 2 (The Language Of Magna Carta) Pg 38Edward I., (1297,) Makes No Provision Whatever For, Or Mention
Of, A Parliament, Unless The Provision, (Ch. 37,) That "Escuage, (A
Military Contribution,) From Henceforth Shall Be Taken Like As It Was
Wont To Be In the Time Of King henry Our Grandfather," Mean That A
Parliament Shall Be Summoned for That Purpose.
[5]The Magna Carta Of John, (Ch. 17 And 18,) Defines Those Who
Were Entitled to Be Summoned to Parliament, To Wit, "The
Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Earls, And Great Barons Of The
Realm, * * And All Others Who Hold Of Us In chief." Those Who Held
Land Of The King in chief Included none Below The Rank Of Knights.
[6] The Parliaments Of That Time Were, Doubtless, Such As Carlyle
Describes Them, When He Says, "The Parliament Was At First A Most
Simple Assemblage, Quite Cognate To The Situation; That Red
William, Or Whoever Had Taken On Him The Terrible Task Of Being
King of England, Was Wont To Invite, Oftenest About Christmas
Time, His Subordinate Kinglets, Barons As He Called them, To Give
Him The Pleasure Of Their Company For A Week Or Two; There, In
Earnest Conference All Morning, In freer Talk Over Christmas Cheer
All Evening, In some Big Royal Hall Of Westminster, Winchester, Or
Wherever It Might Be, With Log Fires, Huge Rounds Of Roast And
Boiled, Not Lacking malmsey And Other Generous Liquor, They Took
Counsel Concerning the Arduous Matters Of The Kingdom."
[7] Hume, Appendix 2.
[8] This Point Will Be More Fully Established hereafter.
[9] It Is Plain That The King and All His Partisans Looked upon The
Charter As Utterly Prostrating the King'S Legislative Supremacy
Before The Discretion Of Juries. When The Schedule Of Liberties
Demanded by The Barons Was Shown To Him, (Of Which The Trial By
Jury Was The Most Important, Because It Was The Only One That
Protected all The Rest,) "The King, Falling into A Violent Passion,
Asked, Why The Barons Did Not With These Exactions Demand His
Kingdom? * * And With A Solemn Oath Protested, That He Would
Never Grant Such Liberties As Would Make Himself A Slave." * * But
Afterwards, "Seeing himself Deserted, And Fearing they Would Seize
His Castles, He Sent The Earl Of Pembroke And Other Faithful
Messengers To Them, To Let Them Know He Would Grant Them The
Laws And Liberties They Desired." * * But After The Charter Had Been
Granted, "The King'S Mercenary Soldiers, Desiring war More Than
Peace, Were By Their Leaders Continually Whispering in his Ears, That
He Was Now No Longer King, But The Scorn Of Other Princes; And That
It Was More Eligible To Be No King, Than Such A One As He." * * He
Applied to The Pope, That He Might By His Apostolic Authority Make
Void What The Barons Had Done.* * At Rome He Met With What
Success He Could Desire, Where All The Transactions With The Barons
Were Fully Represented to The Pope, And The Charter Of Liberties
Shown To Him, In writing; Which, When He Had Carefully Perused,
He, With A Furious Look, Cried out, What! Do The Barons Of England
Endeavor To Dethrone A King, Who Has Taken Upon Him The Holy
Cross, And Is Under The Protection Of The Apostolic See, And Would
Chapter 2 (The Trial By Jury, As Defined by Magna Carta) Section 2
Comments (0)