Covid-19 - The Lies and the Fraud, Terence Smart [great books of all time .txt] 📗

conclusion was that up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus. In Massachusetts, between 85 and 90% of people who tested positive in July 2020 with an amplification cycle of 40 would have been considered negative with an amplification cycle of 30. And yet, all these people had to isolate themselves, with all the dramatic psychological and economic consequences, while they were not sick and probably not contagious at all.

“Tests with such high thresholds (Ct) may not only detect live virus but also gene fragments, remnants of an old infection that do not represent any particular danger,” the experts said.

A virologist at the University of California admits that an RT-PCR test with a Ct greater than 35 is too sensitive. “A more reasonable threshold would be between 30 and 35,” she adds.

The test is telling healthy people that there are sick when they are not but they are classed as a case and go into the covid statistics. In reality you should only be a case if you are ill and need hospital treatment but if they did that they would not get enough cases to lock us down so they have to lie by saying healthy people are sick. A recent example is tennis player Andy Murray testing positive for Covid but he had no symptoms and was healthy, but still he was not allowed to travel to Australia to play in the Australian open. So a positive PCR test does not mean you have covid or died of it. But that is what they are using to drive lockdowns, tiers and restrictions. That is why many Doctor’s, Professors and researchers around the world are calling this pandemic a scam or Scamdemic.

The World Doctor’s Alliance is an independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 agenda. They state this about PCR tests on the front of their website:

PCR tests cannot be verified for accuracy as there is no ‘gold standard’ against which to check them. The virus has not been purified. PCR tests cannot detect viral loads and are prone to false positives. A positive PCR test does not mean that an individual is infected nor infective. In fact, approximately 90% of the PCR positive ‘cases’ are false positives. We therefore have no second wave and no pandemic. The government’s report estimates a false positive rate of between 0.8 to 4.0 % using data from other viral infections – not from covid Viral fragments may remain in people’s bodies for several weeks following recovery from infection. The crisis will never end if we are waiting for zero positive tests. Everyone has probably had a cold caused by a coronavirus and will likely have a few viral fragments matching those of the cousin SARS-CoV-2 virus Testing healthy asymptomatic individuals is non-sensical, unscientific and a colossal waste of money. The governments moon shot daily testing program will cost £100 Billion roughly two thirds of the annual NHS budget. Antibody testing is not the gold standard as many people have T-cell immunity, and antibodies may not circulate following recovery from infection.

 

People will claim they know someone who got sick, or they know someone who died from COVID-19. No, you do NOT know that! All you “know” is that they got sick, or died, or tested positive with a test that does not work.

 

Regarding the PCR tests, Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice-President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years writes, in a piece called “Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False Positives”, dated September 20, 2020, and I quote

“The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 per cent, or near certainty.”

Dr. Yeadon, in agreement with the professors of immunology Kamera from Germany, Kappel from the Netherlands, and Cahill from Ireland, as well as the microbiologist Dr. Arve from Austria, all of whom testified before the German Corona Committee, explicitly points out that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.

The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is – and I quote:

“Simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus, which could be a piece of dead virus, which cannot make the subject sick, and cannot be transmitted, and cannot make anyone else sick.”

Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it!

Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

In November, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centered on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

Testing, especially PCR testing, is the basis for the entire house of cards of Covid restrictions that are wreaking havoc worldwide. From testing comes case numbers. From case numbers come the ‘R number,’ the rate at which a carrier infects others. From the ‘dreaded’ R number comes the lockdowns and the restrictions, such as England’s baffling tiered restrictions that came into force in October 2020.

This PCR faulty testing can also be seen in the actions of the President of Tanzania. President Magufuli of Tanzania tested fruit, goats, motor oil and more with Covid-19 tests and the results were positive. This proves how fake the Covid-19 tests are. The president of Tanzania was suspicious of the coronavirus testing kits, so he sampled various random items from fruit to goats to motor oil and sent them in for Covid-19 testing under various people's names. All but the motor oil came back positive. How can a piece of fruit or a goat have Covid-19? This was done because he noticed that all the Covid tests were coming back positive and he did not believe it. So he started rubbing the swabs on random crap, attached false identities to them and they still came back positive. He called it an act of war by white countries and others who have a lot to gain from this virus being perceived as real.

 

In 2020 Burundi’s President Nkurunziza refused to comply with the World Health Organisation’s Covid vaccination program. He then expelled the WHO team who were coordinating Burundi’s response to the pandemic.

Then President Nkurunziza unexpectedly died from a sudden “heart attack”. His successor promptly changed tack on the pandemic, declared coronavirus “the countries’ biggest enemy” and complied with the WHO demands.

Now Tanzania’s President Magufuli, who also opposed Covid vaccinations and exposed the PCR test fraud, has passed away due to a sudden “heart attack”.

Call me a conspiracy theorist but this looks like too much of a coincidence. Two prominent African leaders had voiced their opposition to Covid vaccinationsand PCR tests and shortly thereafter they both reportedly die of heart attacks.

Between them Presidents Nkurunziza and Magufuli could have derailed the World Health Organisations vaccination plans for Africa and that’s why, I suspect, they were silenced.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=229732

 

“The PCR test is best utilized as a diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of an infection based on clinical signs and symptoms. It certainly should not be used as a screening test when there is low prevalence of disease and should NEVER be used as the sole determinant in the diagnosis of a case. So, if any laboratory uses a PCR assay with that particular primer, they’re likely to get a lot of false positives! Politicians and Health Officials are basing their numbers of cases entirely on the results of these tests, which are not fit for this purpose. They are then using these figures to terrorise the population, and to justify decisions to impose local lockdowns, and increase nonsensical general restrictions which are having a massive impact on people’s lives and their health, and also on the economy, particularly hitting small businesses hard” – By Dr. Malcolm Kendrick

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/28/false-positive-tests/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

IT’S A SCAM: After 48,299 COVID-19 Cases at 37 US Universities – Only 2 Hospitalizations and ZERO Deaths — More Likely to Be Killed By a Dog

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/scam-48299-covid-19-cases-37-us-universities-2-hospitalizations-zero-deaths-likely-killed-dog/

 

 

“Cases mean nothing. It is the first time in history that healthy people have to prove they are not sick, by a fraudulent test that is inaccurate information and has nothing to do with science or reality. We have a casedemic, we don’t have a pandemic” Dr. Sherry Tenpenny

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97% (Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, Clare Craig, Kevin McKernan, et al, Critique of Drosten Study)

The PCR test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to justifying a second lockdown with devastating social and economic impacts including the engineered bankruptcy of tourism, air travel and small businesses, pubs, clubs, restaurants, gym etc.

The above quote confirms unequivocally that the tests adopted by governments to justify the destabilization of their national economy are TOTALLY INVALID. THEY ARE LYING. And those PCR tests are not accompanied by medical diagnosis of the patients who are being tested.

Since the COVID-19 crisis began, all of the WHO and Government so-called ‘mitigation’ policies – lockdowns, social distancing, masks, shutting schools etc, have all been based on data of coronavirus “cases” gathered from the increasingly dubious PCR Test. Despite its many fundamental flaws – and even an warning by its inventor, Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis, who explicitly said not to use his test as a diagnostic for any virus.

“PCR, it’s just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with (like covid) really was going to hurt you”. - Kary Mullis July 12 1997.

Noble Prize winning chemist Kary Mullis stated that his PCR test was only designed to make copies of a specific DNA sample so that it could be later studied in large enough quantities. It is not designed to detect infection or if a particular virus is the cause of an infection.

You can watch Kary Mullis on the video below by researcher spiro skouras.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fn3Hfqc1UME7/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljxah4NrYKU&t=230s

Why have governments and the medical establishment, chosen to base their entire COVID ‘pandemic’ narrative on this highly inaccurate testing regime.  They are using it because it gets them the results that they want and that is endless amounts of false positive cases which are then used to justify lockdowns and restrictions.

If the PCR test does not tell us if a person has Covid or if it cannot determine that someone died of Covid then that means the covid cases and death figures have been hugely exaggerated and have been used to lockdown whole countries for nearly one year. Surely it does not take a genius to see that there is another agenda at play here, one which could have dire consequences for 99% of the world’s population in the near future.

“People are frightened. They are encouraged to do the PCR test, which is flawed. A positive PCR test does not mean that you are infected and/or that you can transmit the virus. The RT-PCR Test is known to produce a high percentage of false positives. Moreover, it does not identify the virus”. – Professor Michel Chossudovsky - award-winning