Covid-19 - The Lies and the Fraud, Terence Smart [great books of all time .txt] 📗

Coronavirus Litigation

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/05/coronavirus-lawsuit.aspx

Dr. Fuellmich is a practicing trial lawyer and an attorney of record for one of the most powerful law firms on the planet that is currently suing Deutsche Bank. He is also litigating other highly consequential lawsuits against various Fortune 500 companies for their fraudulent corporate behavior.

Again, here is Dr. Fuellmich’s epic presentation outlining the open-and-shut case against the perpetrators of the ongoing 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic.

The German Corona Investigative Committee has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since July 10, 2020.

Their conclusions are the following: 

The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal” It is: The biggest tort case ever The greatest crime against humanity ever committed Those responsible must be: Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity Sued for civil damages Deaths There is no excess mortality in any country Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19 Autopsies showed: Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions Almost all deaths were very old people Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics Health Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious Tests: Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles Illegality: The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion Conspiracy: Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules” The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose There can be no talk of a second wave Injury and damage: Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations Anti-corona measures have: Killed innumerable people Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide Children are being taken away from their parents Children are traumatized en masse Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses Redress: A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages

This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a “Corona Scandal” and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And for this reason I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.

Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with the Nuremberg trials after World War II, that is, when they dealt with the main war criminals of the Third Reich. Crimes against humanity are today regulated in section 7 of the International Criminal Code. The three major questions to be answered in the context of a judicial approach to the corona scandal are:

Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR-test pandemic? Specifically, does a positive PCR-test result mean that the person tested is infected with Covid-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the Covid-19 infection?

Do the so-called anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the world’s population from corona, or do these measures serve only to make people panic so that they believe – without asking any questions – that their lives are in danger, so that in the end the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?

Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied, more so than any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic, Mr. Drosten, virologist at charity hospital in Berlin; Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros, Head of the World Health Organization or WHO; because Germany is known as a particularly disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to the corona measures?

Let me first give you a summary of the facts as they present themselves today. The most important thing in a lawsuit is to establish the facts – that is, to find out what actually happened. That is because the application of the law always depends on the facts at issue. If I want to prosecute someone for fraud, I cannot do that by presenting the facts of a car accident. So what happened here regarding the alleged corona pandemic?

The facts laid out below are, to a large extent, the result of the work of the Corona Investigative Committee. This Committee was founded on July 10, 2020 by four lawyers in order to determine, through hearing expert testimony of international scientists and other experts:

 

How dangerous is the virus really?

What is the significance of a positive PCR test?

What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures, both with respect to the world population’s health, and with respect to the world’s economy?

Let me start with a little bit of background information. What happened in May 2019 and then in early 2020? And what happened 12 years earlier with the swine flu, which many of you may have forgotten about? In May 2019, the stronger of the two parties which govern Germany in a grand coalition, the CDU, held a Congress on Global Health, apparently at the instigation of important players from the pharmaceutical industry and the tech industry. At this Congress, the usual suspects, you might say, gave their speeches. Angela Merkel was there, and the German Secretary of Health, Jens Spahn. But, some other people, whom one would not necessarily expect to be present at such a gathering, were also there: Professor Drosten, virologist from the Charite hospital in Berlin; Professor Wieler, veterinarian and Head of the RKI, the German equivalent of the CDC; as well as Mr. Tedros, philosopher and Head of the World Health Organization (WHO). They all gave speeches there. Also present and giving speeches were the chief lobbyists of the world’s two largest health funds, namely the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. Less than a year later, these very people called the shots in the proclamation of the worldwide corona pandemic, made sure that mass PCR tests were used to prove mass infections with Covid-19 all over the world, and are now pushing for vaccines to be invented and sold worldwide.

These infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests delivered, in turn became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social distancing and mandatory face masks. It is important to note at this point that the definition of a pandemic was changed 12 years earlier. Until then, a pandemic was considered to be a disease that spread worldwide and which led to many serious illnesses and deaths. Suddenly, and for reasons never explained, it was supposed to be a worldwide disease only. Many serious illnesses and many deaths were not required any more to announce a pandemic. Due to this change, the WHO, which is closely intertwined with the global pharmaceutical industry, was able to declare the swine flu pandemic in 2009, with the result that vaccines were produced and sold worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret until today.

These vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine flu eventually turned out to be a mild flu, and never became the horrific plague that the pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it would turn into, with millions of deaths certain to happen if people didn’t get vaccinated. These vaccines also led to serious health problems. About 700 children in Europe fell incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely disabled. The vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers’ money had to be destroyed with even more taxpayers’ money. Already then, during the swine flu, the German virologist Drosten was one of those who stirred up panic in the population, repeating over and over again that the swine flu would claim many hundreds of thousands, even millions of deaths all over the world. In the end, it was mainly thanks to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and his efforts as a member of the German Bundestag, and also a member of the Council of Europe, that this hoax was brought to an end before it would lead to even more serious consequences.

Fast forward to March of 2020, when the German Bundestag announced an Epidemic Situation of National Importance, which is the German equivalent of a pandemic in March of 2020 and, based on this, the lockdown with the suspension of all essential constitutional rights for an unforeseeable time, there was only one single opinion on which the Federal Government in Germany based its decision. In an outrageous violation of the universally accepted principle “audiatur et altera pars”, which means that one must also hear the other side, the only person they listened to was Mr. Drosten.

That is the very person whose horrific, panic-inducing prognoses had proved to be catastrophically false 12 years earlier. We know this because a whistleblower named David Sieber, a member of the Green Party, told us about it. He did so first on August 29, 2020 in Berlin, in the context of an event at which Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. also took part, and at which both men gave speeches. And he did so afterwards in one of the sessions of our Corona Committee.

The reason he did this is that he had become increasingly sceptical about the official narrative propagated by politicians and the mainstream media. He had therefore undertaken an effort to find out about other scientists’ opinions and had found them on the Internet. There, he realized that there were a number of highly renowned scientists who held a completely different opinion, which contradicted the horrific prognoses of Mr. Drosten. They assumed – and still do assume – that there was no disease that went beyond the gravity of the seasonal flu, that the population had already acquired cross- or T-cell immunity