The Illuminati and the Deception of History, Terence Smart [fox in socks read aloud TXT] 📗

a heavy terrestrial gas; its molecular weight is 44 which is so heavy (relative to Nitrogen and Oxygen, 99% of Earth atmosphere) CO2 remains close to the ground providing fuel for vegetation's photosynthesis. Plants need CO2 the way animals need Oxygen. So basically CO2 is 0.4% of our atmosphere and if that 0.4% should rise then this planet will succumb to climate change and extinction for humans. When the real facts are that without CO2 we would die because if you reduce CO2 to very low levels then trees, vegetation, crops would die off and so would we because we rely on these to feed humanity.

Climate Change is a fear-based agenda with the purpose of implementing increased government control over our lives. Communism takes many forms but ultimately it is the total monopoly over wealth, power, thought and behavior by the Masonic (Satanist) Jewish central bank cartel. Welcome to the "New World Order."

While some applauded her courage to stand up and speak for her generation, others rolled their eyes in disbelief that an autistic child would be used as a political pawn to tug at the heartstrings of the world while stifling any real scientific discussion.

The problem is Climate Change is not about the environment. It's a fear-based agenda with the purpose of implementing draconian regulations meant to bring about countless green taxes and restrictions, destroy industry, eliminate the middle class, redistribute wealth to 3rd world countries and ultimately destroy the economy, while controlling and micro-managing society via UN Sustainable Development Initiatives put forth as part of UN Agenda 2030. Just like Agenda 21 and 2000's UN Millennium Development Goals - Agenda 2030 is about furthering the creation of a New World Order.

Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore described the cynical and corrupt machinations fueling the narrative of global warming and “climate change” in an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight

Patrick Moore said:

“And so you’ve got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You’ve got the media echo chamber — fake news — repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they’re killing their children. And then you’ve got the green politicians who are buying scientists with government money to produce fear for them in the form of scientific-looking materials. And then you’ve got the green businesses, the rent-seekers, and the crony capitalists who are taking advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs, and government mandates requiring their technologies to make a fortune on this. And then, of course, you’ve got the scientists who are willingly, they’re basically hooked on government grants. When they talk about the 99 percent consensus [among scientists] on climate change, that’s a completely ridiculous and false number. But most of the scientists — put it in quotes, scientists — who are pushing this catastrophic theory are getting paid by public money, they are not being paid by General Electric or Dupont or 3M to do this research, where private companies expect to get something useful from their research that might produce a better product and make them a profit in the end because people want it — build a better mousetrap type of idea. But most of what these so-called scientists are doing is simply producing more fear so that politicians can use it to control people’s minds and get their votes because some of the people are convinced, ‘Oh, this politician can save my kid from certain doom.’

Moore continued:

“It is the biggest lie since people thought the Earth was at the center of the universe. This is Galileo-type stuff. If you remember, Galileo discovered that the sun was at the center of the solar system and the Earth revolved around it. He was sentenced to death by the Catholic Church, and only because he recanted was he allowed to live in house arrest for the rest of his life. So this was around the beginning of what we call the Enlightenment, when science became the way in which we gained knowledge instead of using superstition and instead of using invisible demons and whatever else, we started to understand that you have to have observation of actual events and then you have to repeat those observations over and over again, and that is basically the scientific method. But this abomination that is occurring today in the climate issue is the biggest threat to the Enlightenment that has occurred since Galileo,” declared Moore. “Nothing else comes close to it. This is as bad a thing that has happened on science in the history of science.”

Moore concluded, “It’s taking over science with superstition and a kind of toxic combination of religion and political ideology. There is no truth to this. It is a complete hoax and scam. Climate has ALWAYS changed from decade to decade. There were major swings (volatility) during the 1930s. You had the dust bowl during the summer and in 1936 you had record cold. The 1936 North American cold wave, which also hit Japan and China, still rank among the most intense cold waves in the recorded history of North America. You cannot blame this on soccer moms driving the kids around town burning fossil fuels. Cars were a luxury in the 1930s still. There is just no evidence of human-induced climate change. There is nobody willing to call them out on this nonsense with just showing the dramatic swings in temperature over the centuries”.

The two longest-standing thermometer datasets are kept by the U.K. Met Office. They include the HadCRUT4 dataset, which has been continuously updated since 1850, and the Central England temperature record, the world’s longest regional record that dates to 1659.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and most other doom-mongers promoting a link between human activities and the current warming, use the HadCRUT4 data. The graph shows temperature data from 1850 to 2017 derived from direct thermometer readings and reveals that there has been a general overall warming trend of about 0.85°C (1.5°F) over the last 167 years. But this temperature data collected by the IPCC is deceptive as it was from the end of the “Little Ice Age” in the mid-1850s when naturally the earth when coming out of this cold spell would get warmer. The graph does not show the warm temperatures before the ‘Little Ice Age’.

Below the deceptive IPCC hockey stick graph

Below the very similar graph from the HadCrut4 dataset which shows a very slight rise in the Earth’s temperature over the last 160 years.

The reason that the climate change doom-mongers use the two graphs above is because it is easier to prove that there is a link between human activity and CO2 in the atmosphere when they use this short time span of Earth’s temperature.

The global warming that began in 1976 suddenly and inexplicably stopped in 1998. So CO2 had been increasing but the warming stopped. That’s when Global Warming suddenly morphed into Climate Change.

Let us take a look at the rise and fall of the Earth’s temperature over a much wider time period.

The graph below represents 800,000 years of temperature data. The 100,000-year cycles of ice ages and interglacial warm periods show up clearly.

So it is obvious that a few times in the past the Earth was warmer than today and temperatures rose steeply over a period of time and then declined. But there was NO CO2 emissions from humans at these times but the temperature still climbed. So why are humans being blamed for any current warming of the earth when in the past they were not to blame?

Look at the graph above. 120,000 years ago, the temperature was 8°C (14°F) warmer than today. The polar bears survived and glaciers didn’t melt and sea levels did not rise.

If you look at the temperature of the earth over the last 10,000 years you can clearly see that today’s temperature is pretty low compared to the past which makes a mockery of the climate change alarmist’s theory.

In the graph below we can see that temperatures fell pretty low between 1600 and 1800 and this was known as the ‘Little Ice Age’.

Obviously our current warming trend is a natural result of the Earth leaving the ‘Little Ice Age’ and is not due to CO2 emissions from human activity.

“All this argument, is the temperature going up or not, it’s absurd. Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air.” - Dr. Reid Bryson, Meteorologist.

The graph below shows 65 million years of temperature data. For the bulk of this time earth was so warm that there was no ice at either pole. Only in the relatively recent past has there been any ice at the northern pole. Based on this data, we are living within the coldest period in the last 65 million years.

You will hear from the climate warming alarmists that our temperatures are unusual and unprecedented and are due to human activity. But the earth’s temperatures have always gone up and down throughout the history of the world. Below is the graph for the earth’s temperature over the past 65 million years.

In fact over the past 65 million years we are in one of the coldest periods. There is no global warming, there is no climate change it is a natural tendency of the Earth to go through periods of warming and cooling.

A recent study by economist Bjorn Lomborg estimated that the cost of measures to slow down global warming would be $1.5 trillion per year. What would be the results of this massive outlay of money? According to Lomborg’s calculations temperatures will have been reduced in his best case by 0.17°C (0.31°F). That is less than half of a degree Fahrenheit, or $42 trillion for each reduction of one-tenth of a degree Fahrenheit in global temperature. Would it be worth it and who gets the bulk of this money? The ones who profit are the global elite, the exact ones who are bringing this climate change hoax to the world.

It is pretty simple the earth has warmer periods and cooler periods. From around 800 A.D. to 1200 the planet warmed considerably and civilization prospered. Virtually all of northern Europe, the British Isles, Scandinavia, Greenland, and Iceland were considerably warmer than at present at that time and somehow I don’t believe they had carbon emissions around then. Earth's climate was in a cool period from A.D. 1400 to about A.D. 1860 which is dubbed the "Little Ice Age." But the Global Elite have conned most of the world into believing that this warmer period we are in is in fact caused by humans and they need to extract money from us to pay for it. What about that big yellow thing in the sky, called the Sun, doesn’t that have anything to do with heating this earth up with its solar flares and variations in the sun's energy output. Because of this climate change scam the Global Elite have lined up an agenda for the population of this world and it is called Agenda 21 (they have now renamed it to Agenda 2030), it is frightening, you should take a look.

Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Emeritus Professor of Geography at California State University – Stanislaus, argues that the IPCC has a political agenda promoted by international elites.

“The idea of a carbon footprint is pathetic and ludicrous propaganda, since CO2 is beneficial for life,” Dr. Karlstrom

Dr. Karlstrom, who also manages a website, went on to explain the “global warming” hysteria, and its ultimate agenda:

“Global warming is phony science that was concocted to justify implementation of an international political agenda. The idea of using ‘man-caused global warming’ as a ‘surrogate for war’ and as a way to ‘destroy excess wealth’ originated in American and UN-related think tanks such as the Club of Rome back in the 60’s and 70’s. This pseudo-science is the centrepiece of a phony environmental movement by which the UN hopes to redistribute wealth in the world (toward the super-rich and away from the people) to de-industrialize the industrialized countries (via the UN Kyoto Protocol-type carbon taxes, cap and trade schemes, etc.), and radically reduce the human population. The IPCC is essentially operating with pre-determined conclusions, namely that human activity and carbon emissions cause ‘global warming’ and other environmental and climate problems, even though there is little objective scientific evidence to demonstrate ‘global warming’ is in fact a real phenomenon .”

“The facts, such as we can observe and calculate them, do not support the idea of man-made global warming. Natural processes completely eclipse anything that man can accomplish.” -William Hunt, research scientist National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

“Climate is changing, and climate has always changed. The hoax is that there are some people who are so arrogant to think that they are so powerful they can change climate. Man can’t change climate.” - James Inhofe U.S. Senate’s chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee

“I used to agree with these dramatic warnings of climate disaster…However, a few years ago, I decided to look