Non vowel resources of some good mood, Alexander Borodin [e book reading free .TXT] 📗

but what kind of witches, a person of our time will say, emphasize that adults used to hunt, now they would hide them all in a madhouse, whole nations would have to be put in crazy houses - that's how times have changed. What used to be acceptable is now completely alien, and sometimes vice versa.

Everyone has a different perception of something and, as they say, you can find out from each person’s behavior which radio, which books and which television channels he’s watching or watching. For example, many of those who want to achieve success believe that the army is a waste of time that could be devoted to their own affairs, although, as already mentioned, others call the army a “feeding trough,” and you can’t drive them out of there, because the army it’s a kind of stability - to kick you out of there, if you are an conscript (soldier), no one can, no matter how disagreeable to the leadership, the maximum they can do is put them in guardhouse as part of maintaining discipline - this proves once again that that it all depends on how someone perceived something numb.

This is an affirmative sentence: after suffering always

relief comes - life experience shows that it is.

There would be no happiness, but did misfortune help? As already mentioned, in the case when something happens or didn’t happen as it should have happened, for example, someone went to jail, and if he didn’t get there, he wouldn’t write a book and it wouldn’t come out in millions of copies: read the book "The Moth" by Henri Charriere - byvsheg a prisoner of one of the w e Stoke prisons? It’s his own fault for what happened. What does it mean to have an opinion? For the psychological stability of some there should be a package of psychological attitudes that relieve them of responsibility? When a person cannot satisfy his needs, and this oppresses him, he begins to use deception to satisfy them? As some of those who have the opportunity to educate “sculpt” an explosive mixture from a person, they inspire or, more correctly, cultivate ambition in the educated, then they preach the cult of caution in everything and in all life steps, as a result, there is ambition, and steps to the implementation of ambitious ideas cannot be done because of the excessive cautiousness suggested, because what is called the strength of the spirit is not enough - after this the person begins to erode what is called envy for the success achieved by someone? The successful position is as follows: things are not very, but the spirit is high? What should be the potential of someone who is enslaved to success, and where to get it to achieve success? Meet basic needs first? The more basic needs are met, the more “pillars” on which you hold on, going to success, and the less is the chance of what is called “burnout” when achieving a goal? The main health, the rest is secondary? Does success have a price to pay? Do you need to live here and now, like a soldier in a war, or does each situation need a separate worldview? There are personal goals and imposed by society, to achieve personal goals, motivation is not needed, for them, motivation is to obtain endorphins when they are achieved? Is he an independent person, judging by his appearance? Signs of a potential victim described in work on victimology? Why do all situations called “Lochovsky” happen only with someone separate? The decision to attack or not is made by the attacker based on the appearance of the person? Appearance is important, since it is from him that the “scanning” begins in the attack mode or not, if it is an attack? Some intelligentsia at all times was unhappy with something, is it all the time not comfortable? Some of the revolutionaries are those who do not know how to rejoice? They say that a gendarme is hiding behind some revolutionaries?

By what criteria is the quality of a work, for example, musical, measured by the presence of endorphins in the blood during and after meeting with him? Tolerate is not a problem, it would only be what to expect - does it look like complacency, self-psychotherapy, or is it the way it is? If they give you money for saying that the Earth is flat, or for saying that the Earth does not spin on its axis, would you agree to say so? He knew that the Earth was spinning, but he had a family - there are situations, and if you live in conditions that are considered harsh, you have to be the one who is called bad in order to survive yourself and others?

In countries that are considered rich, a child, as they say, can be pampered; there, the state will solve most of its problems, in particular financial ones, for itself. But a child in a country that is considered not rich can also be pampered if you want to, but then you need to teach him how to satisfy his needs, which will be higher than those of others, so that he does not become unhappy, and learn to do it in such a way that -for this, the surrounding did not become unhappy.

Sexual temperament can be determined by the profession of a person, as a rule, theoretically, those who engage in exact professions, where an account is required, for example, an engineer, will be less temperamental than the humanities, since in the humanitarian professions 100% focus on what -or. It is unlikely that an engineer can be a temperamental person to the extent that a humanist, since in the engineering profession they should not distract thoughts about anything - ask any girl with whom she cheated on her husband, this is a person who does not engage in exact sciences or work related with exact sciences.

Nothing can be removed from the Internet by a court decision, what appears there begins to be duplicated, it is usually called the effect of Barbara Streisend, if I am not mistaken, this citizen sued due to the presence of some information related to it on the Internet, like if it was a photograph of a house, the court ruled to delete it, but everything that needed to be removed was duplicated on the Internet.

Poor people go to gambling clubs, thinking that they are rich, and there they are basically the same as they are, and everyone thinks about how to "get" someone for money. There are a lot of players (meaning those who want to "ride around the ears" and do nothing), if you believe the statistics from the media, as already mentioned, in large states only about 10,000,000 people are engaged in real production of something. Is there an overabundance of geniuses, people "sitting" on benefits, and producers of intangible goods if emigrants do not come for physical labor?

Familiar for high motivation, as a popularization of his intriguing actions, so that it would not be boring to carry out intrigues, he used the names of operations conducted by various army units at different times to name his games: “Train and shell”, “Suffered freedom”, “Suffered justice” , “Shock and Awe”, “Lead Rain”, “Apocalypse”, “Project 5”, “Scorched Earth”. He also adored signaling someone violated various laws and was touched when after his letters there were results like bringing “unclean” people to justice.

 

BRIEFLY ON WORLD POLICY, GEOPOLITICS - DISCUSSIONS WITHIN THE KITCHEN ROOM

Are there competing countries? What is politics - buy a simple textbook on political science, and you understand everything? Politics is sometimes seducing people with a better life, and politics is sometimes not talking about the past, present, but about the future - choose me, and you will live better? Who goes to the opposition - former state employees after retirement or dismissal? Is an oppositionist sometimes or always a state employee, only a state employee not of his own country, but of his geopolitical adversary? If you were a state employee, you should look for a new budget place, if you lost your old one, and think about the future, since, except being a state employee, you don’t know anything else? Directors and correspondents can also be state employees - either their own country or someone else’s, some will shoot and write positive, others will be negative, but in reality sometimes everything is in between the positive and the negative? And here is politics - with each new year of your age you begin to understand that politics is everywhere like oxygen, and even where there is no oxygen? Are rich people sitting in the wings of some revolutions, people in uniform, etc.? The politician and those in his service are artists and propagandists all rolled into one? Higher powers have programmed some people not to love those who do nothing, because the master, by which higher powers are meant, wants everyone to benefit, or circumstances bring up people like that? What is allowed for the artist is not allowed for the civil servant - shouldn't the civil servant have what are considered weaknesses? How do some incompetent people find themselves in strategic positions - by lobbying their interests with relatives or someone else? The presence of parliamentary immunity among deputies in some countries is not just like that; otherwise, can security agencies interfere with their work, influencing their adoption of laws? No matter how trivial it sounds, but does the solid civil position of every citizen of any country, expressed in not paying attention to what is called the propaganda of countries - geopolitical opponents, strengthen the economy of his country? Higher powers partially control the human consciousness - did they give instincts, such as sexual ones, for example, and left the rest to control a person by person? Is a stable state in which people with moderate needs and requirements live, or where people with large needs and requirements live, and at the same time are they (needs) satisfied? Underneath politics are economic reasons - does economics give birth to politics? Nothing has changed - we’ll watch an episode from the film “The State Border” (USSR, 1980, directed by Boris Stepanov), where the rebel leader offers his life and freedom in exchange for criticizing the Soviet regime through foreign media - one of the manipulation methods is shown here , through the suggestion that his state is not perfect? Life will become better only when everyone starts working, and nothing else, since material wealth does not come from anything if your country does not have oil and other resources? If there are no some politicians, this will affect the quality and life expectancy of people in some states - its quality will not be very good, and they will not live much, since chaos will begin - are those politicians who guard civilization? Not a single revolution will increase the standard of living if the state is not rich or rich, but a lot of people live on its territory and there isn’t enough wealth for all, does the level of material well-being increase in the modern world only with the presence of minerals, for example, oil? Paradoxically, but it is precisely for those media workers who are paid money for criticizing an existing power somewhere that is unprofitable for this power to cease to exist - because then those who hired them will no longer be needed? Those who believe that the word patriotism is a simple “load” can be said to voluntarily or unwillingly have to defend the place where he lives, because if the world becomes unipolar, there will be an end to what is considered political freedom - the world should to be multipolar, the higher forces themselves want competition, is it not just that the world is divided into countries, and people speak different languages? Anyone who believes that nothing would have changed if any war had been lost, and that even when his country won the war, he still needs to go to work every day, he is mistaken - if the war were lost, would there be much more? Oddly enough, the most important freedom fighters are the heads of various states, since they do not allow the world to become unipolar, and the unipolar world is the end of freedom, since there will no longer be competition