The Truth about Germany and the World Wars, Terence Smart [best ereader for pdf txt] 📗
- Author: Terence Smart
Book online «The Truth about Germany and the World Wars, Terence Smart [best ereader for pdf txt] 📗». Author Terence Smart
In 1999 at Treblinka a detailed forensic examination was carried out over 6 days using ground radar by Australian Richard Krege, an electronics engineer. GPR ground radar devices are used around the world by geologists and archaeologists. They can detect disturbances in the soil down to about 10 metres underground.
Krege's team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples. The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged "mass graves" portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.
Richard Krege stated this about his findings: "From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site. We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether. Because normal geological processes are very slow acting, disruption of the soil structure would have been detectable even after 60 years. Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp's use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed, Personally, I don't think there was an extermination camp there at all”
Do you really still believe that Hitler and his leaders gassed 6,000,000 Jews?
This camp was near the PolishRussian border and was built to house Russian prisoners of war. When the Soviets entered the camp in 1944 they immediately claimed that 1.5 million had been killed at the camp and they circulated this to all the western media. Six German guards were blamed for these deaths and then sentenced and executed. This 1.5 million figure was soon disputed. According to different sources the amount of deaths are 200,000, 360,000, 250,000, and 79,000. The wide variation of the figures suggest it is all hearsay and was made up by the Russians which was a way of getting back at the Germans.
Again a shortage of Zyklon-B led to many people dying of Typhus and a shortage of fuel to cremate the bodies which meant the Russians took photos of piles of dead bodies which in itself were not evidence of gassings.
The whole building was rebuilt by the Russians after the war and a gas chamber has been added. The tourists who are shown around building are not told this was all built after the war. The photo below shows the camp in 1943 and the camp in present day.
Some of the camps buildings were stacked with people’s clothing and shoes and this is passed off as belonging to the people who have been gassed. The truth is Majdanek was the main holding place (it had a factory) for all items and clothing from the other camps in the area such as Treblinka and Sobibor. The section of the camp were all the stack of shoes were found was a cobbler’s factory were worn out shoes were sent for repair. Polish historian Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz admitted this in his book in 1948.
Even today tourists are shown 2 gas bottles at Majdanek which were supposedly used in the gassings. However as the photo shows below the engravings say CO2. CO2 is Carbon Dioxide and is used in fizzy drinks and can’t kill humans. Also the plaque even states the word Carbon Oxide and there is no such thing as Carbon Oxide.
The Bergen Belsen camp is in Germany and was a prisoner of war camp but was changed to a concentration camp in 1943. The British liberated the camp in April 1945 and were accompanied by the media. No one has ever claimed that gassings took place at this camp however photos of emaciated bodies and mass graves has created the central part of the Holocaust myth. This was supposed to show evidence of mass extermination policies by the Germans. Again the truth is allied bombing destroyed the German factories which provided Zyklon-B. Without Zyklon-B near the end of the war the Typhus epidemic spread in the camp which resulted in the mass deaths.
British armed guards were placed at the camp with warning signs about Typhus.
35,000 people died of Typhus at the camp and when the British arrived at the camp 13,000 lay unburied. The entire camp was then burned to the ground by the British to stop the spread of Typhus. But the Holocaust storytellers claim that Bergen Belsen was evidence of mass gassings by the Germans and obviously this was not the case. In fact after the British took over the camp hundreds more died of Typhus while the British were in charge. Dead bodies does not mean it is evidence of death by gassings.
Below the bodies that lay unburied.
The victims in fact all died from typhus and malnutrition which is confirmed by German Military, Red Cross and British Military medical records – this is never pointed out whenever this picture or video is shown. Ironically the deaths were mostly due to a lack of Zyklon-B, at the end of the war with Germany collapsing, leading to a mass typhus outbreak in the camp.
The imagery associated with the “Holocaust” – photographs of piles of dead bodies, emaciated prisoners, Jews and other prisoners being “rounded up,” train cars filled with dead bodies, etc. – has been used to psychologically and emotionally traumatize the masses, including vulnerable school children, rendering them easily susceptible to manipulation, and facilitating the false narrative of “6 million Jews sadistically murdered by the Nazis” to be literally implanted in their minds.
When the British took control of Bergen Belsen there was about 60,000 people in the camp even though the camp could only hold 3,000 prisoners. Over 50, 000 people had entered the camp in the autumn of 1944 because of the advancing Russian army and the camp was unable to cope with such an influx of people. The Germans at the camp did not have enough supplies to ward of malnutrition and disease and so many died. When the British took over the camp 14,000 inmates died at the camp while the British where in charge. Did the British have some type of extermination policy or did the prisoners die of disease and malnutrition?
One of the most famous ‘Holocaust survivor’ books is Ann Frank’s Diary. It is allegedly the work of a young Jewish girl of 15. However we now know huge parts of this diary were written many years after her death by her father, Otto Frank as he testified in an Amsterdam court in 1993. But it was sold to the world as a witness to the Holocaust even though Ann Frank died of Typhus at Bergen Belsen.
Below on the left Ann Franks own handwriting and on the right a plaque which supposedly displays a page of Ann Frank’s diary in the Ann Frank School in Amsterdam. Obviously the one on the right is not Ann Frank’s handwriting, does it look like the handwriting of a 15 year old, no.
A part of Anne Frank’s diary is written in ball point pen. Milton Reynold’s ballpoint pen, manufactured in his Reynolds International Pen Company and called “Reynolds Rocket” was the first commercially successful ballpoint pen and never came into production until 1949 and was not available to everyone until 1951. Anne Frank’s diary is supposedly written about her life in hiding from 1942 to 1944, during the German occupation of the Netherlands in World War II. So how can she have written part of this diary with a ball point pen between 1942 and 1944 when ball point pens were not available? The reason is because her father wrote it much later when the ball point pens were available.
In 1980 as a result of a lawsuit in a German court, the German State Forensic Bureau forensically examined the original diary manuscript. The Bureau determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne Frank’s writing.
The Swedish journal Frio Ord published two articles commenting on The Diary of Anne Frank. A condensation of these articles appeared in the April 15, 1959 issue of Economic Council Letter, as follows:
“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth and may become more effective than truth. The Western world has for some years been made aware of a young Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to her personally written story, “Anne Frank’s Diary.” Any informed literary inspection of this book has shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager”.
The New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well-known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50.000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the “Anne Frank Diary.”
Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.
Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been “officially reported”? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda?
Professor Robert Faurisson analysed different versions of the diary and interviewed Anne Frank's father. In 1978 Faurisson wrote a report to expose the diary as a work of fiction written by Anne's father.
Again were are the stories, movies, documentaries about all the Ukrainian and Russian children that the Jews killed during the Bolshevik Revolution and the Holodomor. Anne Frank died of a disease were
Comments (0)