Memoirs Of Aaron Burr, Volume 1, Matthew L. Davis [book club suggestions .txt] 📗
- Author: Matthew L. Davis
Book online «Memoirs Of Aaron Burr, Volume 1, Matthew L. Davis [book club suggestions .txt] 📗». Author Matthew L. Davis
That He Had Been Chosen By The People, But Was Cheated Out Of His
Election By The Corruption Of The Canvassers. Great Asperity And
Virulence Were Exhibited By Both Political Parties On The Occasion.
From The Moment That Colonel Burr Was Driven To Interfere In The
Controversy, He Took Upon Himself, Almost Exclusively, The Management
Of The Whole Case On The Side Of The Anti-Federal Party. His
Accustomed Acumen, Vigilance, And Zeal, Were Promptly Put In
Requisition. Full Scope Was Allowed For The Display Of Those Great
Legal Talents For Which He Was So Pre-Eminently Distinguished. It Has
Been Known To Only A Very Few Individuals That On Colonel Burr Rested
Nearly The Whole Labour; And That Nothing Was Done, Even By The
Canvassers, But Under His Advice And Direction. It Has Therefore Been
Deemed Proper To Insert Here Some Of The Official Details Of The Case.
They Are Worthy Record, As An Interesting Part Of The Political
History Of The State Of New-York.
"_Statement Of The Case By The Canvassers, For The Advice Of Rufus
King And Aaron Burr_.
Chapter XVI Pg 318"Otsego.--By The 26Th Section Of The Constitution Of The State Of
New-York, It Is Ordained That Sheriffs And Coroners Be Annually
Appointed, And That No Person Shall Be Capable Of Holding Either Of
The Said Offices For More Than Four Years Successively, Nor The
Sheriff Of Holding Any Other Office At The Same Time. By The Ninth
Section Of The Act For Regulating Elections, It Is Enacted That One Of
The Inspectors Shall Deliver The Ballots And Poll-Lists, Scaled Up, To
The Sheriff Of The County; And, By The Tenth Section Of The Said Act,
It Is Further Enacted, That Each And Every Sheriff Of The Respective
Counties In This State Shall, Upon Receiving The Said Enclosures,
Directed To Be Delivered To Him As Aforesaid, Without Opening Or
Inspecting The Same, Or Any Or Either Of Them, Put The Said
Enclosures, And Every One Of Them, Into One Box, Which Shall Be Well
Closed And Sealed Up By Him, Under His Hand And Seal, With The Name Of
His County Written On The Box, And Be Delivered By Him Into The Office
Of The Secretary Of This State, Where The Same Shall Be Safely Kept By
The Secretary, Or His Deputy. By The Eleventh Section Of The Said Act,
All Questions Arising On The Canvass And Estimate Of The Votes, Or On
Any Of The Proceedings Therein, Shall Be Determined By A Majority Of
The Members Of The Joint Committee Attending; And Their Judgment Shall
Be Final, And The Oath Of The Canvassers Requires Them Faithfully,
Honestly, And Impartially To Canvass And Estimate The Votes Contained
In The Boxes Delivered Into The Office Of The Secretary Of This State
By The Sheriffs Of The Several Counties.
"On The 17Th Of February, 1791, Richard R. Smith Was Appointed Sheriff
Of The County Of Otsego, And His Commission Gives Him The Custody Of
That County Until The 18Th Of February, 1792. On The 13Th Of January,
1792, He Writes A Letter To The Council Of Appointment, Informing Them
That, As The Year For Which He Was Appointed Had Nearly Elapsed, He
Should Decline A Reappointment.
"On The 30Th Of March, 1792, The Council Of Appointment Appointed
Benjamin Gilbert To The Office Of Sheriff Of The Said County, With A
Commission, In The Usual Form, To Keep The County Until The 17Th Of
February Next. His Commission Was Delivered To Stephen Van Rensselaer,
Esq., On The 13Th Of April Last, To Be Forwarded By Him To The Said
Benjamin Gilbert. By The Affidavit Of The Said Benjamin Gilbert,
Herewith Delivered, It Appears That He Qualified Into The Office Of
Sheriff On The 11Th Day Of May, 1792. On The First Tuesday In April,
1792, Richard R. Smith Was Elected Supervisor Of The Town Of Otsego,
In Said County, And On The First Tuesday In May Took His Seat At The
Board Of Supervisors, And Assisted In The Appointment Of Loan Officers
For The County Of Otsego. By The Affidavit Of Richard R. Smith,
Herewith Delivered, It Appears That The Ballots Taken In The County Of
Otsego Were Delivered To Him As Sheriff, And By Him Enclosed In A
Sufficient Box, On Or About The 3D Of May, Which Box He Then Delivered
Into The Hands Of Leonard Goes, A Person Specially Deputed By Him For
The Purpose Of Delivering The Said Box Into The Hands Of The Secretary
Of This State, Which Was Accordingly Done, As Appears By Information
From The Secretary.
"A Small Bundle Of Papers, Enclosed And Sealed, Was Delivered To The
Secretary With The Box, On Which Is Written, 'The Votes Of The Town Of
Cherry Valley, In The County Of Otsego.
Chapter XVI Pg 319Richard R. Smith, Sheriff.'
Several Affidavits, Herewith Delivered, State Certain Facts Respecting
This Separate Bundle, Said To Be The Votes Of Cherry Valley.
"On This Case Arise The Following Questions:--
"1. Was Richard R. Smith The Sheriff Of The County Of Otsego When He
Received And Forwarded The Ballots By His Special Deputy?
"2. If He Was Not Sheriff, Can The Votes Sent By Him Be Legally
Canvassed?
"3. Can The Joint Committee Canvass The Votes When Sent To Them In Two
Parcels, The One Contained In A Box, And The Other Contained In A
Paper, Or Separate Bundle? Or,
"4. Ought They To Canvass Those Sealed In The Box, And Reject The
Others?
"Tioga.--It Appears That The Sheriff Of Tioga Delivered The Box
Containing The Ballots To B. Hovey, His Special Deputy, Who Set Out,
Was Taken Sick On His Journey, And Delivered The Box To H. Thompson,
His Clerk, Who Delivered It Into The Secretary'S Office.
"_Question_. Ought The Votes Of Tioga To Be Canvassed?
"Clinton.--It Appears That The Sheriff Of Clinton Delivered The Box
Containing The Ballots To Theodorus Platt, Esq., Who Had No
Deputation, But Who Delivered Them Into The Secretary'S Office, As
Appears By His Affidavit.
"_Question._ Ought The Votes Of Clinton To Be Canvassed?"
_Mr. King'S Opinion To The Canvassers_.
"Otsego.--It May Be Inferred, From The Constitution And Laws Of The
State, That The Office Of Sheriff Is Held During The Pleasure Of The
Council Of Appointment, Subject To The Limitation Contained In The
26Th Section Of The Constitution. The Sheriff May Therefore Hold His
Office For Four Years, Unless Within That Period A Successor Shall
Have Been Appointed, And Shall Have Entered Upon The Execution Of The
Office.
Chapter XVI Pg 320The Term Of Four Years From The Appointment Of R. R. Smith Not
Having Expired, And B. Gilbert Not Having Entered Upon The Execution
Of The Office Before The Receipt And Delivery Of The Votes By R. R.
Smith To His Deputy, I Am Of Opinion That R. R. Smith Was Then Lawful
Sheriff Of Otsego.
"This Opinion Is Strengthened By What Is Understood To Be Practice,
Namely, That The Office Of Sheriff Is Frequently Held For More Than A
Year Under One Appointment.
"R. R. Smith'S Giving Notice To The Council Of Appointment Of His
Disinclination To Be Reappointed, Or His Acting As Supervisor, Cannot,
In My Opinion, Be Deemed A Resignation Or Surrender Of His Office.
"Should Doubts, However, Be Entertained Whether R. R. Smith Was
_Lawfully_ Sheriff When He Received And Delivered The Votes To His
Deputy, The Case Contains Facts Which In Another View Of The Subject
Are Important. It Appears That R. R. Smith Was Appointed Sheriff Of
Otsego On The 17Th Of February, 1791, And Afterwards Entered Upon The
Execution Of His Office: That No Other Person Was In The Execution Of
Or Claimed The Office After The Date Of His Appointment, And Before
The Time When He Received And Delivered The Votes Of The County To His
Deputy; That During That Interval R. R. Smith Was Sheriff, Or The
County Was Without A Sheriff; That R. R. Smith, During The Election,
And When He Received And Delivered The Votes To His Deputy, Continued
In The Actual Exercise Of The Shrievalty, And That Under Colour Of A
Regular Appointment. From This Statement It May Be Inferred, That If
R. R. Smith, When He Received And Delivered The Votes To His Deputy,
Was Not _De Jure_, He Was _De Facto_, Sheriff Of Otsego.
"Though All The Acts Of An Officer _De Facto_ May Not Be Valid, And
Such Of Them As Are Merely Voluntary And Exclusively Beneficial To
Himself Are Void; Yet Such Acts As Tend To The Public Utility, And
Such As Be Would Be Compellable To Perform, Such As Are Essential To
Preserve The Rights Of Third Persons, And Without Which They Might Be
Lost Or Destroyed, When Done By An Officer _De Facto_, Are Valid.
"I Am Therefore Of Opinion, That Admitting R. R. Smith, When He
Received And Delivered The Votes To His Deputy, Was Not _De Jure_
Sheriff, Yet That He Was _De Facto_ Sheriff; And That His Receiving
And Delivering The Votes Being Acts Done Under Colour Of Authority,
Tending To The Public Utility, And Necessary To The Carrying Into
Effect The Rights Of Suffrage Of The Citizens Of That County, They Are
And Ought To Be Deemed Valid; And Consequently The Votes Of That
County May Lawfully Be Canvassed.
"2D Question. The Preceding Answer To The First Question Renders An
Answer To The Second Unnecessary.
Chapter XVI Pg 321"3D And 4Th Questions. The Sheriff Is Required To Put Into One Box
Every Enclosure Delivered To Him By An Inspector Appointed For That
Purpose By The Inspectors Of Any Town Or District; And For Omitting To
Put Any Such Enclosure Into The Box, He Is Liable To Prosecution; But
In Case Of Such Omission, The Votes Put Into The Box, And Seasonably
Delivered Into The Secretary'S Office, May, Notwithstanding Such
Omission, Be Lawfully Canvassed;
Comments (0)