Memoirs Of Aaron Burr, Volume 1, Matthew L. Davis [book club suggestions .txt] 📗
- Author: Matthew L. Davis
Book online «Memoirs Of Aaron Burr, Volume 1, Matthew L. Davis [book club suggestions .txt] 📗». Author Matthew L. Davis
On The 6Th Of November, 1792, The Legislature Met. On The 13Th,
Petitions, Memorials, &C. Were Presented To The House Of Assembly,
Demanding An Inquiry Into The Conduct Of The Board Appointed To
Canvass The Votes Given For Governor, &C. At The Preceding Election,
Held In The Month Of April. On The 21St The House, In Committee Of The
Whole, Took Up The Subject. Witnesses Were Examined At The Bar;
Various Resolutions And Modifications Were Offered And Rejected. The
Debate Was Continued At Intervals From The 21St Of November, 1792,
Until The 18Th Of July, 1793. The Minority Of The Canvassers Entered A
Protest Against The Proceedings Of The Majority, Which It Is Due To
Them To Insert Here.
"_The Protest Of Messrs. Jones, Roosevelt, And Gansevoort_.
"We, The Subscribers, Members Of The Joint Committee Appointed To
Canvass And Estimate The Votes Taken At The Last Election In This
State For Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, And Senators, Do Dissent
From, And Protest Against, The Determination Of The Major Part Of Said
Committee Respecting The Votes Taken At The Said Election In The
County Of Otsego.
"I. Because These Votes Having Been Given By The Freeholders Of
Otsego, And The Packages Containing The Same Having Been Received And
Transmitted In Season To The Secretary'S Office By The Person Acting
As Sheriff Of The County, The Committee Have No Right To Reject Them
Under The Pretence Of Judging Of The Legality, Validity, Operation, Or
Extent Of The Sheriff'S Authority Or Commission; These Commissions
Being Foreign To The Duty Of Their Appointment, And Capable Of A
Decision Only In The Ordinary Courts Of Law.
"Ii. Because, If The Committee Were By Law Authorized To Examine And
Determine The Legality And Extent Of The Sheriff'S Authority And
Commission, We Are Of Opinion That Richard R. Smith, At The Time He
Received And Transmitted The Ballots, Was The Lawful Sheriff Of
Otsego. By The Constitution, The Sheriff, Whatever May Be The Form Of
His Commission, Must Hold His Office During The Pleasure Of The
Council Of Appointment; And, By The Law Of The Land, He Must Continue
Therein Until Another Is Appointed And Takes Upon Himself The Office.
Richard R. Smith, Having Been Appointed On The 27Th Of February, 1791,
And Benjamin Gilbert Having Been Appointed On The 30Th Of March, 1792,
But Not Having Qualified Or Taken Upon Himself The Office Until
Richard R. Smith Had Received And Forwarded The Same, Must Be Deemed
The Lawful Sheriff Of The County. The Uniform Practice Which Has
Prevailed Since The Establishment Of The Constitution, Precludes All
Doubt Respecting Its True Construction On This Point. For Although The
Commissions Of The Sheriffs Are For One Year, They Have Nevertheless
Continued To Exercise The Office Until Others Were Appointed And
Entered Upon The Execution Thereof, Which Has Often Been Long After
The Expiration Of The Year, And Sometimes After The Same Person Has
Remained In Office More Than Four Years Successively. And Such
Sheriffs, Sometimes After The Expiration Of Their Year, At Others
After Having Held The Office For Four Successive Years, Have Received
And Transmitted Ballots For Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, And
Senators, Which Ballots Have On Former Elections Been Received And
Canvassed;
Chapter XVI Pg 327And Even Upon The Present Canvass, The Committee Have
Canvassed The Ballots Taken In The Counties Of Kings, Orange, And
Washington, Notwithstanding The Year Had Expired For Which The
Sheriffs Of These Counties Were Commissioned, And No New Commissions
Had Been Issued. Hence The Sheriffs Of Those Counties, In Receiving
And Transmitting The Ballots, Must Have Acted Under Their Former
Commissions, Since A Mere Appointment Without A Commission, And A
Compliance With The Requisites Prescribed By Law, Could Not, In Our
Opinion, Give Any Authority As Sheriff To The Person So Appointed.
"Iii. Because, If Richard R. Smith, At The Time He Received And
Forwarded The Ballots, Was Not Sheriff, The County Was Without A
Sheriff, A Position Too Mischievous To Be Established By A Doubtful
Construction Of Law.
"Iv. Because, If Richard R. Smith Was Not Of Right Sheriff Of The
County At The Time He Received And Forwarded The Ballots, He Was Then
Sheriff In Fact Of That County; And All The Acts Of Such An Officer
Which Tend To The Public Utility, Or To Preserve And Render Effectual
The Rights Of Third Persons, Are Valid In Law.
"V. Because, In All Doubtful Cases, The Committee Ought, In Our
Opinion, To Decide In Favour Of The Votes Given By The Citizens, Lest
By Too Nice And Critical An Exposition Of The Law The Rights Of
Suffrage Be Rendered Nugatory.
"We Also Dissent From, And Protest Against, The Determination Of The
Major Part Of The Said Committee Respecting The Votes Taken At The
Said Election In The County Of Clinton;
"Because It Appears That The Sheriff Of The Said County Deputed A
Person By Parole To Deliver The Box Containing The Ballots Of The Said
County Into The Secretary'S Office. Such Deputation We Deem To Be
Sufficient; And As There Is Satisfactory Evidence That The Box Was
Delivered In The Same State In Which It Was Received From The Sheriff,
The Votes, In Our Opinion, Ought To Be Canvassed.
"We Also Dissent From, And Protest Against, The Determination Of The
Major Part Of The Said Committee, By Which They Declare That George
Clinton Was, By The Greatest Number Of Votes Taken At The Last
Election For Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, And Senators, Chosen
Governor Of This State; And That Pierre Van Courtlandt Was, By The
Greatest Number Of Votes At The Said Election, Chosen
Lieutenant-Governor; And That John Livingston Was, By The Greatest
Number Of Votes At The Said Election, In The Eastern District Of This
State, Chosen A Senator In The Said Eastern District.
Chapter XVI Pg 328"Because It Cannot Be Ascertained Whether George Clinton Was Chosen
Governor, Or Pierre Van Courtlandt Lieutenant-Governor Of This State,
By The Greatest Number Of Votes At The Last Election, Without
Examining The Ballots Contained In The Boxes Delivered Into The
Secretary'S Office By The Sheriffs Of The Counties Of Otsego And
Clinton--There Being A Sufficient Number Of Freeholders In These
Counties, With The Votes Given In The Other Parts Of The State For
John Jay As Governor And Stephen Van Rensselaer As
Lieutenant-Governor, To Give Them A Majority Of Votes For Those
Offices. Nor Can It Be Ascertained Whether John Livingston Was Chosen
A Senator In The Eastern District By The Greatest Number Of Votes In
That District, Without Examining The Votes Taken In The County Of
Clinton--There Being A Sufficient Number Of Freeholders In That
County, With The Votes Given In Other Parts Of The District For Thomas
Jenkins As A Senator, To Give Him A Greater Number Of Votes For A
Senator Than The Number Given For The Said John Livingston.
"Samuel Jones,
"Isaac Roosevelt,
"Leonard Gansevoort."
Joshua Sands, Another Member Of The Board Of Canvassers, Entered
Separately A Protest, But Substantially The Same As The Preceding.
The Majority Of The Canvassers Presented A Document To The
Legislature, In Which They Assigned Their Reasons For The Course They
Had Pursued. That Document Was Drawn By Colonel Burr. The Original
Draught, With His Emendations, Has Been Preserved Among His Papers. On
The Motion Of A Member, It Was Read In The House The 28Th Day Of
December, 1792, And Is Entered At Large On Their Journals As
Follows:--
"_The Reasons Assigned By The Majority Of The Canvassers In
Vindication Of Their Conduct_.
"The Joint Committee Appointed To Canvass And Estimate The Votes For
Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, And Senators At The Last Election,
Having Been Constrained, By A Sense Of Their Duty In The Discharge Of
The Trust Reposed In Them, To Reject The Ballots Returned From The
Counties Of Clinton, Otsego, And Tioga; And Perceiving That Attempts
Are Made To Misrepresent As Well The Principles Of Their Determination
As The Facts On Which They Are Founded, Feel It Incumbent On Them To
State The Grounds Of Their Decision.
Chapter XVI Pg 329"Clinton And Tioga.--A Box, Said To Contain The Ballots Of The County
Of Clinton, Was Deposited In The Secretary'S Office By A Theodore
Platt, Without Any Deputation Or Other Authority, Accompanied Only By
His Own Affidavit, That He Had Received The Said Box From The Sheriff
Of Clinton.
Another Box, Said To Contain The Ballots Of The County Of Tioga, Was
Delivered By The Sheriff Of The County Of Tioga To His Deputy,
Benjamin Hovey, Who, Being Detained By Illness On The Road, Delivered
The Said Box To One James H. Thompson, By Whom It Was Deposited In The
Secretary'S Office.
"The Joint Committee, Pursuant To The Law, Are Sworn To Canvass The
Votes 'Contained In The Boxes Delivered Into The Office Of The
Secretary Of The State By The Sheriffs Of The Several Counties.' Hence
Arose A Question, Whether This Was Not A _Personal Trust_, Which Could
Not Be Legally Performed By Deputy? Upon This Point We Entertained
Different Opinions; But Agreed That, If The Discretion Of The
Committee Was To Be In Any Degree Controlled By The Directions Of The
Law, There Appeared No Room To Doubt Of The Illegality Of Canvassing
Boxes Which Were Not Delivered By A Sheriff Or The Deputy Of A
Sheriff. The Ballots Contained In These Boxes Were Therefore Rejected;
Not, However, Without Sensible Regret, As No Suspicion Was Entertained
Of The Fairness Of Those Elections.
"Otsego.---It Appears That Richard R. Smith, On The 17Th Of February,
1791, Was Appointed Sheriff Of The County Of Otsego, To Hold That
Office Until The 18Th Of February, 1792; That A Commission Was Issued
Agreeably To That Appointment; That On The 13Th Of January, 1792, He
Wrote To The Governor And Council That He Should Decline A
Reappointment; That On The 30Th Of March, 1792, Benjamin Gilbert Was
Appointed Sheriff Of The Said County; That The Commission To The Said
Benjamin Gilbert Was, On The 13Th Of April, 1792, Delivered To Stephen
Van Rensselaer, One Of The Council Of Appointment, To Be By Him
Forwarded; That The Said Commission Was In The Hands Of William
Cooper, Esq., First Judge Of The Said County, On Or Before The 3D Of
May; That The Said Richard R. Smith, On The First Tuesday In April,
Was Elected Supervisor Of The Town Of Otsego, Accepted That Office,
And On The 1St Day Of May Took His Seat At The Board Of Supervisors,
Assisted In The Appointment Of Loan Officers, And _Then_ Declared That
He Was No Longer Sheriff Of The County, But That Benjamin Gilbert Was
Appointed In His Place. It Also Appeared That Benjamin Gilbert Had No
Notice Of His Said Appointment, Or Of The Receiving Of The Ballots By
The Said Richard R.
Comments (0)