Memoirs Of Aaron Burr, Volume 1, Matthew L. Davis [book club suggestions .txt] 📗
- Author: Matthew L. Davis
Book online «Memoirs Of Aaron Burr, Volume 1, Matthew L. Davis [book club suggestions .txt] 📗». Author Matthew L. Davis
Sworn To The Execution Of The Office On The 11Th; That, On The 3D Of
May, The Said Richard R. Smith Put Up The Ballots Of The Said County
In The Store Of The Said William Cooper, Esq., In Whose Hands The
Commission Of Benjamin Gilbert Then Was; That The Box Said To Contain
The Votes Of The Said County Was Delivered Into The Secretary'S Office
By Leonard Goes Previous To The Last Tuesday In May, Under A
Deputation From The Said Richard R. Smith;
Chapter XVI Pg 330Together With The Said Box,
And At The Same Time, The Said Leonard Goes Delivered A Separate
Packet Or Enclosure, Which, By An Endorsement Thereon, Purported To
Contain 'The Ballots Received From The Town Of Cherry Valley, In The
County Of Otsego.'
"The Manner Of The Delivery Of The Said Box And Enclosure, And The
Authority Of The Said Leonard Goes, Were Reported To The Committee By
The Secretary Of The State.
"These Votes Were Not Canvassed For The Following Reasons:--
"1. The Committee Found Themselves Bound, By Their Oath And By The
Directions Of The Law Before Mentioned, To Canvass Only The Votes
Contained In The Boxes Which May Have Been Delivered Into The
Secretary'S Office By The _Sheriffs_ Of The Several Counties. It
Appeared To Them Absurd To Suppose This Duty Should Be So Expressly
Enjoined, And That They Should Nevertheless Be Prohibited From
Inquiring Whether The Boxes Were Or Were Not Delivered By Such
Officers; Or That They Should Be Restrained From Ascertaining A Fact,
Without The Knowledge Of Which It Was Impossible That They Could
Discharge The Duty With Certainty To The Public Or With Confidence To
Themselves. They Could Not Persuade Themselves That They Were, Under
_That_ Law And _That_ Oath, Compelled To Canvass And Estimate Votes,
However Fraudulently Obtained, Which Should Be Delivered Into The
Secretary'S Office _By Any Person Styling_ Himself Sheriff, Though It
Should At The Same Time Be Evident To Them That He Was _Not The
Sheriff_. If Such Was To Be Their Conduct, A Provision Intended As A
Security Against Impositions Would Be An Engine To Promote Them. They
Conceived, Therefore, That The Objection To An Inquiry So Important,
And In A Case Where The Question Was Raised And The Inquiry Imposed
Upon Them By The Suggestions Of The Secretary, Must Have Arisen From
Gross Misrepresentation Or Willful Error.
"Upon Investigating The Right Of The Said Richard R. Smith To Exercise
That Office, The Facts Appeared As Herein-Before Stated.
"2. The Constitution Requires That Sheriffs Shall Be _Annually
Appointed_; Which, To Our Apprehension, Implies That No Person Shall
Exercise The Office By Virtue Of Any Other Than An _Annual_
Appointment. And Should It Even Be Admitted That The Council May, At
_Their Pleasure_, Remove A Sheriff Within The Year, Yet We Do Not See
On What Ground It Can Be Denied That The Duration Of The Office Is
Limited To One Year, Unless A New Appointment Should Take Place. It
Would Otherwise Be True That The Council Could Indirectly, Or By A
Criminal Omission, Accomplish What Is Not Within Their Direct Or Legal
Authority. It Will Be Readily Admitted That An Appointment And
Commission For Three Years Would Be Void; And Surely The Pretence Of
One Thus Claiming Should Be Preferred To A Usurpation Without Even
Such Appearance Of Right, And Against The Known Right Of Another.
Chapter XVI Pg 331To
Assert, Therefore, That 'By The Constitution The Sheriff, Whatever May
Be The Form Of His Commission, Must Hold His Office During The
Pleasure Of The Council Of Appointment; And That, By The Law Of The
Land, He Must Continue Therein Until Another Is Appointed And Has
Taken Upon Himself The Office,' Is An Assertion Accompanied With No
Proof Or Reason, And Is Repugnant To The Letter And Spirit Of The
Constitution, Which Is Eminently _The Law Of The Land_. The Practice
Which Has Prevailed Since The Revolution, As Far As Hath Come To Our
Knowledge, Does Not Warrant The Position; Neither Could Mere Practice,
If Such Had Prevailed, Justify The Adoption Of A Principle Contrary To
The Obvious Meaning Of The Constitution. Upon The Present Occasion We
Have Not Canvassed The Votes Of Any County Which Were Not Returned By
A Sheriff Holding His Office Under An Appointment Unexpired. The
Sheriffs Of Kings, Orange, And Washington Had All Been Reappointed
Within The Present Year, Which Satisfied The Words Of The
Constitution, And Was The _Known_ And Avowed Reason Which Influenced
The Committee To Estimate The Ballots Of Those Counties. The Doctrine
Concerning The Constitutional Pleasure Of The Council In The
Appointment Of The Office Of Sheriffs _Had Not Then Been Invented_.
"3. But Even Admitting The Visionary Idea That The Office Of Sheriff
(_Whose Duration Is Limited By The Constitution_) Can Nevertheless Be
Holden _During The Pleasure_ Of The Council Of Appointment, Yet That
Appears To Have Been Determined By The Letter Of The Appointment And
Commission, By The Appointment Of Benjamin Gilbert, By The Declaration
Of Richard R. Smith, And By His Acceptance And Exercise Of Another
Office, Which Is, By The Constitution, Declared To Be Incompatible
With The Office Of Sheriff.
"It Was Evident, Therefore, That Richard R. Smith Had No Authority By
Appointment, By Commission, By The Constitution, Or By Any Law, To
Hold Or Exercise The Office Of Sheriff On The Third Of May.
"4. As Richard R. Smith Was Not Legally Or Constitutionally Sheriff On
The Third Of May, Neither, Under The Circumstances Of The Case, Can He
Be Said To Have Been Sheriff In Fact, So As To Render His Acts Valid
In Contemplation Of Law: The Assumption Of Power By Mr. Smith Appears
To Have Been Warranted By No Pretence Or Colour Of Right. The Time
Limited For The Duration Of His Office Had Expired By The Express
Tenure Of His Commission And Appointment, And He Had Formally Declared
His Determination Not To Accept A Reappointment. He Had, Two Days
Previous To His Receiving The Ballots, Openly Exercised An Office
Incompatible With That Of Sheriff; Then Declared That He Had Resigned
The Office Of Sheriff, And That Benjamin Gilbert Was Appointed In His
Place; And By An Affidavit Which Was Produced To The Committee, It
Appeared That, Upon The Day Upon Which He Had Put Up The Ballots In
The House Of The Said William Cooper, He, The Said Richard R. Smith,
Declared That He Had Resigned The Office Of Sheriff. The Business
Might With Equal Care And Certainty Have Been Executed By Benjamin
Gilbert. The Single Act Of Receiving Ballots Could Of Itself Continue
_No Man_ A Sheriff--Least Of All _A Man Disavowing That Office, And
Then In The Exercise Of Another_.
Chapter XVI Pg 332It Was Foreign To The Duty Of The
Committee To Provide Against Evils Which May Possibly Arise From
Casual Vacancies In The Office Of Sheriff By Death And Otherwise.
Vacancies Will Sometimes Unavoidably Happen, Without Further
Legislative Provision.
"There Is Not, Therefore, In Our Opinion, Any Application To The
Subject, Or Force In The Objection, 'That If Richard R. Smith Was Not
Sheriff, The County Was Without A Sheriff;' Neither Is The Position
True In Fact, For It Appears That The County Was Not Then Without A
Sheriff. At The Time The Ballots Were Received, It Was Well Known That
Benjamin Gilbert Was Appointed Sheriff, And That His Commission Was In
The Hands Of William Cooper, In Whose Store Richard R. Smith Put Up
The Ballots. It Is Also To Be Fairly Inferred That, Had Proper
Measures Been Taken To Give Notice To Mr. Gilbert, He Would Forthwith
Have Qualified And Undertaken The Execution Of The Office. It Cannot,
Therefore, Consistent With Truth Or Candour, Be Asserted That There
Was The Remotest Probability That 'Mischiefs' Could In Any Parallel
Case Ensue From The Principles Adopted By The Committee.
"It Did Not Seem Possible, Therefore, By Any Principle Of Law, By Any
Latitude Of Construction, To Canvass And Estimate The Ballots
Contained In The Box Thus Circumstanced.
"But, Had The Question Been Doubtful, It Was Attended By Other
Circumstances, Which Would Have Determined The Committee Against
Canvassing Those Ballots.
"5. Because The Notice Of The Appointment Of Benjamin Gilbert Was
Received By Richard R. Smith On Or Before The First Of May, And His
Commission Was Received By William Cooper On Or Before The Third Of
May. Mr. Gilbert Might Therefore Have Been Notified, Qualified, And
Executed The Duty. He Did Actually Qualify On The Eleventh, Which Gave
Ample Time To Have Forwarded The Ballots Before The Last Tuesday In
May. These Facts, With Other Suggestions Of Unfair Practices, Rendered
The Conduct Of The Otsego Election Justly Liable To Suspicion; And The
Committee Were Constrained To Conclude That The Usurpation Of
Authority By Richard R. Smith Was Wanton And Unnecessary, And
Proceeded From No Motive Connected With The Preservation Of The Rights
Of The People Or The Freedom And _Purity Of Elections_.
"6. Because, Having In Several Instances, By _Unanimous Vote_,
Rejected Ballots Of Whole Towns, Free From Any Suspicion Of
Unfairness, By Reason Of A Defect In _Form Only_ Of The Return, The
Committee Conceived Themselves The More Strongly Bound To Reject
Ballots Where The Defect Was Substantial, And The Conduct At Least
Questionable;
Chapter XVI Pg 333Especially As The Law Regards The Custody Of Enclosures
Containing The Ballots As A Trust Of High Importance, And Contemplates
But Three Persons In Whose Hands They Are To Be Confided Until They
Come To The Possession Of The Canvassers, To Wit, The Inspector, The
Sheriff, And The Secretary; All Officers Of Great Responsibility And
Confidence.
"7. Because The Return, Upon The Face Of It, Appeared To Be Illegal.
The Law Requires The Sheriff, 'Upon Receiving The Said Enclosure,
Directed To Be Delivered To Him As Aforesaid, Without Opening Or
Inspecting The Same, Or
Comments (0)